Print

Please login or register.
1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever
Login with username, password and session length

[di540]

Its not a State grant of anything! Its an officially recognized entity, by established law, within the state and by the State. Note upper and lower case.

.
Make up your mind, please. Before you said that it was NOT
going to be anything similar to 501.c.8.
.

There is nothing else that will eliminate the real property taxes on the "Ranch."

.
Real property is a state grant of a tenure in land, for which
the holder receives a title, and the state receives taxes.

[DW]

It is not the State that taxes you Maximo,
it is the County.

A section 501* entity is a Federal designation for Internal Revenue purposes!

Stop blowing smoke!

[di540]

It is not the State that taxes you Maximo,
it is the County.

.
A county is a state's administrative subdivision.
.
You are a slippery marketeer who can't answer a
simple question, and when you get caught, you
go on the attack.

[di540]

mAximo is correct.

DW is blowing smoke.

I know far more about county politics and budgets than mAximo.
I've studied both for a long time before I ran for commissioner.

Some forget that there are others here who see through the smoke.
Some know of what these others are trying to BS the naive here with.

.
You are as bad as DW.
I asked DW a question and he is beating around the bush.
All you are doing is covering up for him by blowing more
smoke than he did.

[BobW]

Hi mAximo,

I'm following what you're saying and have got to charge you with playing semantics with a group not interested in it.

Of course you are correct that American transactions can be called a state grant of "feudal tenure". So?  

All this stuff is traced back to feudal times.  So what?  Even Magna Carta wasn't typed out by Kristeen Keeler and John Porfumo.

No American "owns land". They own estates in it.  Other areas outside the Common Law world use a different system.  It's still semantics.

(I'm not addressing the proposal above.)

BobW

[di540]

Hi mAximo,

I'm following what you're saying and have got to charge you with playing semantics with a group not interested in it.

Of course you are correct that American transactions can be called a state grant of "feudal tenure". So?  

All this stuff is traced back to feudal times.  So what?  Even Magna Carta wasn't typed out by Kristeen Keeler and John Porfumo.

No American "owns land". They own estates in it.  Other areas outside the Common Law world use a different system.  It's still semantics.

(I'm not addressing the proposal above.)

BobW

.
So how is it that you're not playing semantics for making a
mountain out of my small mole-hill?  But that's not the
real issue.
The issue is exactly the kind of not-for-profit association
that he proposed, and all I'm getting is a royal run-around
for asking that question: no, not private; no, not state.
Seeing that I have to play 20 Questions here:
Are the articles of association bigger than a breadbox?

[DW]

Last time Maximo......

You need a re-education from the "public school' doctrin you have absorbed.

Your statement that "No Americans owns land" is the standard BS that most of you have accepted as gospel!

If you are to move to wild Wyoming you had better learn to Patent your ground. The process removes the heavy hand of the State and County from your property and lots pf people, have done it, and are doing it, everyday!

I specifically told you that I was not divulging my methodology, for the "Ranch" at this time as I didn;t want to start a long disertation, like this one, that will be covered in later documentation.

You are also incorrect as to the relationship of the County and State, but that is "public" education, again.

Think positive, Maximo!

[Johnny Silverseed]

Wanna do a share in a community effort like this ranch and I want a guy like the one who knows so much, like the guy here, to be there... issat you, Maximo?
Johnny Silverseed

[Johnny Silverseed]

mAximo is correct.

DW is blowing smoke.

I know far more about county politics and budgets than mAximo.
I've studied both for a long time before I ran for commissioner.

Some forget that there are others here who see through the smoke.
Some know of what these others are trying to BS the naive here with.

.
You are as bad as DW.
I asked DW a question and he is beating around the bush.
All you are doing is covering up for him by blowing more
smoke than he did.

Sometimes cowboys blow smoke after they've shot their wad[cutter]... I think DW knows of what he speaks and is reluctuant to be too informative -to ye of little faith- in this venue ...pearls before swine, so to speak... Few know the reality of contract law and the wool pulled over our collective eyes. I for one- ain't blind anymore. Tell me, My fellow statesman, are you familiar with the Consolidated Annual Financial Reports for the city, county and state (corporations) within which you ran for office? (if not, see http://www.anthonyhargis.com/genocide.htm)
Johnny Silverseed; sui juris, straight-shooter