In answer to the thread topic question, "What type of people are in the FSP?", I have found that the vast majority of posters (who may or may not be representative of the members) are mainstream libertarians with slightly right-wing leanings but tolerant toward left-libertarian issues. There have been relatively few ill-humored, dogmatic posters. Personally, I am a half-black, part-native-american, atheist, nursed-on-Cato-policy-reports, evolutionary anarcho-capitalist from California. Though I am more concerned about left-libertarian issues (and also taxes!), I have had little ideological disagreement with any of our comrades.
The most significant division I have seen so far here is between those favoring large, empty, rural, western states and those favoring small, denser, more urban northeastern states. There is a slight political correlation here similar to the voting split in the 2000 election. I do hope that the chosen state will have both significant urban areas and forests and fields for hunting.
On the topic of local socialism, the operative word is SUBSIDIARITY, which is used a lot here in Europe, where they are having similar constitutional discussions to those in the US a couple centuries ago. Subsidiarity means deciding questions at the lowest appropriate level: federal, national, regional, local, community, family, individual. At a low (local-community) level, socialism is supported by freedom of association. At a higher level, when one can no longer easily move to escape it, socialism becomes tyranny.