Free State Project Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: Fishing for a criterion  (Read 3132 times)

Solitar

  • Guest
Fishing for a criterion
« on: October 29, 2002, 03:36:45 pm »

Just for MouseBorg ;D
who wrote over on the Montana and Wyoming thread...

"Personally I've been looking into the fishing aspects. If a state ain't got good fishing then it ain't much good for nuthin. I mean, if the fish wouldn't live there, then why would I?"  ;)

So, how is the fishing in the various candidate states?
Freshwater or Saltwater?
Will large inland lakes and reservoirs suffice instead of an ocean?
Babbling mountain brookies or slow muddy catfish?
Logged

JayPrince

  • Guest
Re:Fishing for a criterion
« Reply #1 on: October 29, 2002, 05:50:11 pm »


Damn, another reason to make it Alaska.  Some of the best fishing in the world.

And all kinds -- from off shore fishing, to fly fishing, to competitive fishing (lots of fishers trying to hook the same fish!).

Not to mention hunting, whaling, etc.
Logged

Robert H.

  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1361
  • Jeffersonian
    • Devolution USA
Re:Fishing for a criterion
« Reply #2 on: October 30, 2002, 12:56:12 am »


Thats umm... Montana, Maine, Wyoming, Idaho, & North Dakota. The order will likely change, along with more eliminations, after more research. Interestingly enough, the process of elimination seems to work nicely.


Do you do any ice-fishing, MB?  Never tried it myself, but thought it might interesting.  It would also be applicable to any of the above states.
Pages: [1]   Go Up
 

anything