POSTING GUIDELINES and ADVICE FOR NEW MEMBERS
Bill has this habit of turning every conversation into a Geo-lib one. So, we created the Geo-Lib “commons” specifically to give those concerned with Geo-Lib issues a venue and to keep other threads from being hijacked. Bill was told to discuss Geo-Libertarianism as much as he wants, only keep it in the Geo-Lib area. He continued to hijack threads and he kept receiving warnings. Yesterday, the warnings ran out.
BillG may have been doing what he thought was important and though I wouldn't have banned him myself, it seemed a valid option.There was even a forum created specifically regarding this and still other threads would get hijacked about creating land taxation and get moved to "The Commons".
I liked the guy myself. Even though I am more of an an-cap, I found his ideas well worth considering.
Yeah, give the guy another chance. I doubt we'll have a problem with him (though maybe we can turn to the guys who hijack threads with Rand and Rothbard rhetoric and hold them to the same standards of restraint).
What the bloody hell? We've banned Bill now? Geo-libertarianism might suck, but I don't think we should be banning people for for bringing it up. Is BillG to become a martyr for his cause among our forum? Free BillG! Note: I still think we should abolish this "Commons" forum though, but let Bill return and work with us for our shared goals.
Quote from: Dalamar49 on March 14, 2004, 04:59:40 pmWhat the bloody hell? We've banned Bill now? Geo-libertarianism might suck, but I don't think we should be banning people for for bringing it up. Is BillG to become a martyr for his cause among our forum? Free BillG! Note: I still think we should abolish this "Commons" forum though, but let Bill return and work with us for our shared goals. With Bill and Todd talking of a total tax take of 1.2 trillion to1.5 trillion dollars are they as bad as the flat income tax and sales tax people that want to take that amount in federal taxes alone. Granted I do not hold to taking people land, but I do not hold to taken peoples liquid assets either by force. The stated goal is to cut taxes and spending by at least 2/3rds, Todds and Bills idea would do that probally a lot more because I think they overstate land value. The Fair taxers and Forbes flat taxers are revenue neutral for federal taxes and thus fall very short of the goal. The biggest problem I have with the high rate LVT is that it would really ruin a small percentage of people who do not deserve it.
Bill has this habit of turning every conversation into a Geo-lib one. So, we created the Geo-Lib “commons†specifically to give those concerned with Geo-Lib issues a venue and to keep other threads from being hijacked. Bill was told to discuss Geo-Libertarianism as much as he wants, only keep it in the Geo-Lib area. He continued to hijack threads and he kept receiving warnings. Yesterday, the warnings ran out.
GOOD Riddins.Perhaps now he won't be scaring would be FSPers away with his rantings on this board.Tracy
FINALLY people taking action.I agree, archive The Commons and lets start some useful discussions. I've got a lot more productive things to do than trying to contain socialist propaganda.