Free State Project Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Pages: 1 [2] 3   Go Down

Author Topic: COVID-19, CORONAVIRUS: Also See Health News Updates thread  (Read 7726 times)

scm

  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 35
Re: COVID-19, CORONAVIRUS, SARS-COV-2
« Reply #15 on: April 27, 2020, 09:15:26 am »

This doctor explains at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZVe3PQ-dHwY&feature=youtu.be that the so-called tests for Covid-19 don't actually test for the virus, but instead for DNA/RNA sequences that are the same as any of the Covid-19 DNA/RNA sequences. A sequence is a series of bases (DNA amino acids). There are tens of thousands of bases in a virus. The letters A, C, G and T are used for the 4 different amino acids that make up the bases. So a sequence can be any arrangement of two or more of any of those bases. Any damaged cell in the body (which have millions of DNA/RNA bases) or any bacteria, fungus, microbe, or virus can have the same DNA/RNA sequences as Covid-19. So the test just shows that someone has one of the same sequences as Covid, but not the whole virus. So they're greatly inflating the number of real cases. He said the H1N1 virus in 2008 was way more harmful than this Covid virus. The lockdowns are for ulterior motives, undoubtedly involving enriching the wealthy ruling class and impoverishing everyone else. See https://questioningcovid.com

Of course the video was banned from YouTube.
Logged

KDus

  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 109
  • Made it halfway from CA.
Re: COVID-19, CORONAVIRUS, SARS-COV-2
« Reply #16 on: April 27, 2020, 01:39:03 pm »

and the website in the post is blocked by my employers firewall. huh
Logged

Luck

  • FSP Participant
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3075
Re: COVID-19, CORONAVIRUS: THE FINAL ANSWER
« Reply #17 on: May 06, 2020, 12:07:26 pm »

THE FINAL ANSWER

GOOD COVID WEBSITE:
https://questioningcovid.com/

One article there is called Is Coronavirus Contagious at
https://nourishingtraditions.com/is-coronavirus-contagious/

Amazingly, it starts off by mentioning the Maunder minimum when there were no sunspots in parts of the 17th and 18 centuries. When sunspots returned, there was a pandemic. Miles' paper on the sunspot cycle -- http://milesmathis.com/global.pdf -- discussed a connection between the recent solar minimum and the coronavirus, I think, unless he discussed that privately on CuttingThroughTheFog.com. This article discusses connections between the start of telegraphy and other electrical tech over the decades and pandemics. It also claims that viruses are actually exosomes that remove debris from within cells to help them survive. So the pandemic appears to be caused by 5G, which was started in Wuhan and other places where the death toll has been high. The electrical interference causes the splitting of O2, making it hard for victims to breathe. The ventilators do harm instead of good.
« Last Edit: May 06, 2020, 12:09:22 pm by Luck »
Logged

Luck

  • FSP Participant
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3075
Re: COVID-19, CORONAVIRUS: THE FINAL ANSWER
« Reply #19 on: May 12, 2020, 11:00:14 am »

5091

The Greatest Heist ever Sold. Corona as a cover for a $2 trillion heist.
http://mileswmathis.com/heist.pdf

In the Year 2007 Faith in a Quick Test Led to a False Epidemic
Dr. Perl suspected then that such false epidemics are "going to become more common.”
https://www.nytimes.com/2007/01/22/health/22whoop.html
« Last Edit: August 02, 2020, 04:25:13 pm by Luck »
Logged

Luck

  • FSP Participant
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3075
Re: COVID-19, CORONAVIRUS: THE FINAL ANSWER
« Reply #20 on: May 13, 2020, 12:11:07 pm »

Re The Greatest Heist ever Sold. Corona as a cover for a $2 trillion heist.
http://mileswmathis.com/heist.pdf

Miles predicts that the "deep state" will bring martial law against the big bankers, because he assumes that if the bankers take too much bailout money, there won't be much left for the deep state from taxpayer money. But https://mythfighter.com/ explains that because the U.S. is monetarily sovereign, it doesn't need taxpayer money at all. It can just print money for whatever it wants. So I don't think the deep state will have martial law to go against the bankers. I think 5G is what the Covid thing is really about, i.e. providing cover for installing 5G.

Kelly Brogan, MD, says: Have you noticed these towers popping up around your neighborhood lately? During the present global lockdown, Telecom companies have accelerated the installation of 5G towers throughout the world, including in schools, and highly populated areas — all without consent. They claim it’s to increase your internet speed, but what they aren’t telling you is the darker side that includes, global surveillance, the capacity to beam millimeter waves for crowd control (or worse), and the well-evidenced consequences on the biology of living entities including children, plants, and insects. Simply put, 5G is a global, for-profit, human experiment happening right now - without your consent (because when you don’t say no, you’re saying yes). … [Her associates] have collected experts to inform you of what are not otherwise being told AND what you can do to take back your power! They’re hosting the 5G Summit. https://the5gsummit.com/?idev_id=23031

I don't know if the summit will be worthwhile. I don't have time to listen much. They may have way too much info. I just need the basic facts and suggestions.
« Last Edit: May 13, 2020, 12:20:26 pm by Luck »
Logged

KDus

  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 109
  • Made it halfway from CA.
Re: COVID-19, CORONAVIRUS: THE FINAL ANSWER
« Reply #21 on: May 14, 2020, 10:48:26 am »

The 5G thing is unrelated.
1. Very little is actually deployed.
2. It is very low power
3. It is on the same frequencies that were high power TV for decades.
Logged

scm

  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 35
Re: COVID-19, CORONAVIRUS: THE FINAL ANSWER
« Reply #22 on: May 14, 2020, 12:19:18 pm »

The 5G thing is unrelated.
1. Very little is actually deployed.
2. It is very low power
3. It is on the same frequencies that were high power TV for decades.

1. Not true, check coverage maps
Here is at&t.   https://www.att.com/5g/coverage-map/
T mobile. https://www.t-mobile.com/coverage/5g-coverage-map
(And this does not include all of Elon musks 5g satellites above us already.
2. Not true, It’s not the “power” that matters. It’s the wavelength
3. What is a “high power TV”?
Tv “amplifiers” work on much different frequencies and wavelengths. If that is what you are referring too.

Let take this one step further. Check out the places in this list and see if they have 5g
https://whdh.com/news/here-is-the-states-latest-town-by-town-breakdown-of-coronavirus-cases/
« Last Edit: May 14, 2020, 12:32:33 pm by scm »
Logged

scm

  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 35
Re: COVID-19, CORONAVIRUS: THE FINAL ANSWER
« Reply #23 on: May 14, 2020, 04:55:56 pm »

Pulsed, data-modulated, Radio-frequency Electromagnetic Microwave Radiation (RF-EMR) exposures may be exacerbating COVID-19 viral replication or the spread or lethality of the disease. It is highly probable that one of the best things Wuhan can do to control the epidemic in the city is to power off the 4G/5G antennas.

https://scientists4wiredtech.com/mar-22-argument-for-a-covid-19-epidemic-causation-mechanism/
Logged

Luck

  • FSP Participant
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3075
Re: COVID-19, CORONAVIRUS: THE FINAL ANSWER
« Reply #24 on: May 16, 2020, 05:34:27 pm »

It's hard to say what's true, since the ruling class likes to control all sides of any debate. Who are the "scientists4wiredtech"? See http://mileswmathis.com/updates.html
Logged

KDus

  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 109
  • Made it halfway from CA.
Re: COVID-19, CORONAVIRUS: THE FINAL ANSWER
« Reply #25 on: May 18, 2020, 04:15:05 pm »

The 5G thing is unrelated.
1. Very little is actually deployed.
2. It is very low power
3. It is on the same frequencies that were high power TV for decades.

1. Not true, check coverage maps
Here is at&t.   https://www.att.com/5g/coverage-map/
T mobile. https://www.t-mobile.com/coverage/5g-coverage-map
(And this does not include all of Elon musks 5g satellites above us already.
2. Not true, It’s not the “power” that matters. It’s the wavelength
3. What is a “high power TV”?
Tv “amplifiers” work on much different frequencies and wavelengths. If that is what you are referring too.

Let take this one step further. Check out the places in this list and see if they have 5g
https://whdh.com/news/here-is-the-states-latest-town-by-town-breakdown-of-coronavirus-cases/
[EDIT] I concede that the 5G services have expanded dramatically since late last year when I met with other broadcast engineers, on the topic.
And, the correlation of the timing is curious.
But, you are wrong on the other points.
TV stations broadcast at 500,000 to 1 MILLION watts, or more. That's high power. That is monumentally different than a few watts or even 100 watts.
TV channels were moved, at great cost, to free up spectrum for 5G. Thus, part of 5G (the part that works) is on the EXACT same frequencies that TV was. (600MHz) The rest isn't different than wi-Fi
« Last Edit: May 19, 2020, 10:46:00 am by KDus »
Logged

Luck

  • FSP Participant
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3075
Re: COVID-19, CORONAVIRUS: See Health News Updates thread
« Reply #26 on: May 27, 2020, 09:03:00 am »

6204
.
How to oppose 5G “small cell” towers
http://emfsafetynetwork.org/how-to-oppose-small-cell-5g-towers/

Oppose 5G. The exposure to EMFs would be at an unprecedented scale, affecting all life.
https://www.change.org/p/missouri-senators-oppose-5g-the-exposure-to-emfs-would-be-at-an-unprecedented-scale-affecting-all-life
"The wireless industry plans on installing 300,000 antennae across the U.S.  In some areas that means putting mini-cell towers up to 6 on a block, sometimes as close as 15 ft away from homes.  While 4G wavelengths travel along the surface of the skin, with 5G our skin will absorb the emissions causing it to rise in temperature."

The surveillance is also an important issue, since that's what it seems to be primarily for. Tv and radio stations are usually not very close to people but a 2010 Swedish study in Sweden and the U.S. found that cancer rates are higher around radio stations. The 5G towers will be much closer to people and continuously.

« Last Edit: May 27, 2020, 09:09:14 am by Luck »
Logged

Luck

  • FSP Participant
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3075
Re: COVID-19, CORONAVIRUS: See Health News Updates thread
« Reply #27 on: July 30, 2020, 10:04:39 am »

6836

MASKS DON'T WORK

The article below seems to be conclusive. Seasonal contagion, like the flu, is due to changes in humidity. Virulence increases as humidity decreases, i.e. esp. in winter months. It only takes a small number of virus particle to cause infection in those who are not immune. There are hundreds of them per cubic meter of air. N95 masks are said to remove 95% of particles from the air we breathe through the masks. So some viruses get through the masks with nearly every breath. We don't wear masks constantly, so we're also breathing them in then even more. So masks are ineffective.

Masks Don't Work: A Review of Science Relevant to COVID-19 Social Policy
(See complete article at https://www.greenmedinfo.com/blog/masks-dont-work-review-science-relevant-covid-19-social-policy-0 )
(by D G Rancourt, Former tenured and Full Professor of physics at the University of Ottawa, Canada. Known for applications of physics education research. Published over 100 scientific articles in the areas of ... measurement methods, and earth and environmental science....)
...
The present paper about masks illustrates the degree to which governments, the mainstream media, and institutional propagandists can decide to operate in a science vacuum, or select only incomplete science that serves their interests. Such recklessness is also certainly the case with the current global lockdown of over 1 billion people, an unprecedented experiment in medical and political history.
...
Physics and Biology of Viral Respiratory Disease and of Why Masks Do Not Work

In order to understand why masks cannot possibly work, we must review established knowledge about viral respiratory diseases, the mechanism of seasonal variation of excess deaths from pneumonia and influenza, the aerosol mechanism of infectious disease transmission, ... and the mechanism of the so-called minimum-infective-dose.

In addition to pandemics that can occur anytime, in the temperate latitudes there is an extra burden of respiratory-disease mortality that is seasonal, and that is caused by viruses. For example, see the review of influenza by Paules and Subbarao (2017). This has been known for a long time, and the seasonal pattern is exceedingly regular. ...

In a landmark study, Shaman et al. (2010) showed that the seasonal pattern of extra respiratory-disease mortality can be explained quantitatively on the sole basis of absolute humidity, and its direct controlling impact on transmission of airborne pathogens.

Lowen et al. (2007) demonstrated the phenomenon of humidity-dependent airborne-virus virulence in actual disease transmission between guinea pigs, and discussed potential underlying mechanisms for the measured controlling effect of humidity.

The underlying mechanism is that the pathogen-laden aerosol particles or droplets are neutralized within a half-life that monotonically and significantly decreases with increasing ambient humidity. This is based on the seminal work of Harper (1961). Harper experimentally showed that viral-pathogen-carrying droplets were inactivated within shorter and shorter times, as ambient humidity was increased.

Harper argued that the viruses themselves were made inoperative by the humidity ("viable decay"), however, he admitted that the effect could be from humidity-enhanced physical removal or sedimentation of the droplets ("physical loss")....

In any case, the explanation and model of Shaman et al. (2010) is not dependent on the particular mechanism of the humidity-driven decay of virions in aerosol / droplets. Shaman's quantitatively demonstrated model of seasonal regional viral epidemiology is valid for either mechanism (or combination of mechanisms), whether "viable decay" or "physical loss".

The breakthrough achieved by Shaman et al. is not merely some academic point. Rather, it has profound health-policy implications, which have been entirely ignored or overlooked in the current coronavirus [[so-called]] pandemic.

In particular, Shaman's work necessarily implies that, rather than being a fixed number (dependent solely on the spatial-temporal structure of social interactions in a completely susceptible population, and on the viral strain), the epidemic's basic reproduction number (R0) is highly or predominantly dependent on ambient absolute humidity.

For a definition of R0, see HealthKnowlege-UK (2020): R0 is "the average number of secondary infections produced by a typical case of an infection in a population where everyone is susceptible." The average R0 for influenza is said to be 1.28 (1.19-1.37); see the comprehensive review by Biggerstaff et al. (2014).

In fact, Shaman et al. showed that R0 must be understood to seasonally vary between humid-summer values of just larger than "1" and dry-winter values typically as large as "4" (for example, see their Table 2). In other words, the seasonal infectious viral respiratory diseases that plague temperate latitudes every year go from being intrinsically mildly contagious to virulently contagious, due simply to the bio-physical mode of transmission controlled by atmospheric humidity, irrespective of any other consideration. [[Humidity is high in summer and low in winter. High summer humidity reduces contagion. Low winter humidity increases it.]]

Therefore, all the epidemiological mathematical modelling of the benefits of mediating policies (such as social distancing), which assumes humidity-independent R0 values, has a large likelihood of being of little value, on this basis alone. For studies about modelling and regarding mediation effects on the effective reproduction number, see Coburn (2009) and Tracht (2010).

To put it simply, the "second wave" of an epidemic is not a consequence of human sin regarding mask wearing and hand shaking. Rather, the "second wave" is an inescapable consequence of an air-dryness-driven many-fold increase in disease contagiousness, in a population that has not yet attained immunity.
« Last Edit: August 02, 2020, 07:04:21 pm by Luck »
Logged

Luck

  • FSP Participant
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3075
Re: COVID-19, CORONAVIRUS: See Health News Updates thread
« Reply #28 on: July 30, 2020, 10:04:54 am »

6836

MASKS DON'T WORK
(Continued from Previous Post)

... Shaman's work further necessarily implies [[apparently]] that the dryness-driven high transmissibility (large R0) arises from small aerosol particles fluidly suspended in the air; as opposed to large droplets that are quickly gravitationally removed from the air.

Such small aerosol particles fluidly suspended in air, of biological origin, are of every variety and are everywhere, including down to virion-sizes (Despres, 2012). It is not entirely unlikely that viruses can thereby be physically transported over inter-continental distances (e.g., Hammond, 1989).

More to the point, indoor airborne virus concentrations have been shown to exist (in day-care facilities, health centres, and onboard airplanes) primarily as aerosol particles of diameters smaller than 2.5 μm, such as in the work of Yang et al. (2011):

"Half of the 16 samples were positive, and their total virus concentrations ranged from 5,800 to 37,000 genome copies [[per cubic meter]]. On average, 64 per cent of the viral genome copies were associated with fine particles smaller than 2.5 µm, which can remain suspended for hours. Modelling of virus concentrations indoors suggested a source strength of 1.6 ± 1.2 × 10^5 genome copies [[per cubic meter of]] air [[per hour]] and a deposition flux onto surfaces of 13 ± 7 genome copies [[per square meter per hour]] by Brownian motion. Over 1 hour, the inhalation dose was estimated to be 30 ± 18 median tissue culture infectious dose (TCID50), adequate to induce infection. These results provide quantitative support for the idea that the aerosol route could be an important mode of influenza transmission."

Such small particles (<2.5 μm) are part of air fluidity, are not subject to gravitational sedimentation [[i.e. don't soon fall out of the air]], and would not be stopped by long-range inertial impact. This means that the slightest (even momentary) facial misfit of a mask or respirator renders the design filtration norm of the mask or respirator entirely irrelevant. ... For example, see Balazy et al. (2006).

Mask stoppage efficiency and host inhalation are only half of the equation, however, because the minimal infective dose (MID) must also be considered. For example, ... if  the MID is amply surpassed by the virions carried in a single aerosol particle able to evade mask-capture, then the mask is of no practical utility, which is the case.

Yezli and Otter (2011), in their review of the MID, point out relevant features:
- most respiratory viruses are as infective in humans as in tissue culture having optimal laboratory susceptibility
- it is believed that a single virion can be enough to induce illness in the host
- the 50%-probability MID ("TCID50") has variably been found to be in the range 100 [[to]] 1000 virions
- there are typically 10^3-10^7 [[i.e. 1 thousand to 10 million]] virions per aero[so]lized influenza droplet with diameter 1 [[to]] 10 μm
- the 50%-probability MID easily fits into a single (one) aero[so]lized droplet

For further background:
- A classic description of dose-response assessment is provided by Haas (1993).
- Zwart et al. (2009) provided the first laboratory proof, in a virus-insect system, that the action of a single virion can be sufficient to cause disease.
- Baccam et al. (2006) calculated from empirical data that, with influenza A in humans, "we estimate that after a delay of ~6 [[hours]], infected cells begin producing influenza virus and continue to do so for ~5 [[hours]]. The average lifetime of infected cells is ~11 [[hours]], and the half-life of free infectious virus is ~3 [[hours]]. We calculated the [in-body] basic reproductive number, R0, which indicated that a single infected cell could produce ~22 new productive infections."
- Brooke et al. (2013) showed that, contrary to prior modeling assumptions, although not all influenza-A-infected cells in the human body produce infectious progeny (virions), nonetheless, 90% of infected cell are significantly impacted, rather than simply surviving unharmed.
- All of this to say that: if anything gets through (and it always does, irrespective of the mask), then you are going to be infected. Masks cannot possibly work. It is not surprising, therefore, that no bias-free study has ever found a benefit from wearing a mask or respirator in this application.

Therefore, the studies that show partial stopping power of masks, or that show that masks can capture many large droplets produced by a sneezing or coughing mask-wearer, in light of the above-described features of the problem, are irrelevant. For example, [[see]] such studies as these: Leung (2020), Davies (2013), Lai (2012), and Sande (2008).

Why There Can Never Be an Empirical Test of a Nation-Wide Mask-Wearing Policy

As mentioned above, no study exists that shows a benefit from a broad policy to wear masks in public. There is good reason for this. It would be impossible to obtain unambiguous and bias-free results:
- Any benefit from mask-wearing would have to be a small effect, ... which would be swamped by the larger effects, notably the large effect from changing atmospheric humidity.
- Mask compliance and mask adjustment habits would be unknown.
- Mask-wearing is associated (correlated) with several other health behaviours; see Wada (2012).
- The results would not be transferable, because of differing cultural habits.
- Compliance is achieved by fear, and individuals can habituate to fear-based propaganda, and can have disparate basic responses.
- Monitoring and compliance measurement are near-impossible, and subject to large errors.
- Self-reporting (such as in surveys) is notoriously biased, because individuals have the self-interested belief that their efforts are useful.
- Progression of the epidemic is not verified with reliable tests on large population samples, and generally relies on non-representative hospital visits or admissions.
- Several different pathogens (viruses and strains of viruses) causing respiratory illness generally act together, in the same population and/or in individuals, and are not resolved, while having different epidemiological characteristics.

(See complete article at https://www.greenmedinfo.com/blog/masks-dont-work-review-science-relevant-covid-19-social-policy-0 )
« Last Edit: August 02, 2020, 07:03:04 pm by Luck »
Logged

Luck

  • FSP Participant
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3075
Re: COVID-19, CORONAVIRUS: Also See Health News Updates thread
« Reply #29 on: August 31, 2020, 06:41:41 am »

7166

The CDC all but admits Covid is Fake
by Miles Mathis
First published August 30, 2020

On August 26, the CDC updated its site with a co-morbidities section, where they admit only about 6% of the reported deaths by Covid in the US in 2020 were due to Covid alone. The other 94% of deaths included an average of 2.6 other causes—although we still aren't told which cause was primary. Most of these deaths were among the elderly, which means we can include one other co-morbidity: OLD AGE. This reduces the death-by-Covid number from 185,000 to about 11,000. That is not a Covid pandemic, since 11,000 is a pretty small number for an 8-month period. In the same period, about 30,000 people died in car wrecks. In fact, according to mainstream numbers, about 37,000 people die of the regular flu in every 8-month period. So Covid is more than three times less dangerous than the [normal] flu.
(See more at http://mileswmathis.com/logic.pdf )
Logged
Pages: 1 [2] 3   Go Up