For example, you have no problem condeming or banning somene for sharing their faith which you call proselytizing but it is no problem if some homosexual wants to preach their belief system and try to get others to agree with them.
While on the subject of bigotry, in particular, it's absurd to argue that these are just two different points of view of equal value. I am arguing tolerance for others based on choices which do not infringe on the rights of others (definitely not bigotry) and you are arguing intolerance* for others based on their choices which do not infringe on the rights of others (bigotry IMHO).
None of that speaks to whether there really is a God who proclaims certain behaviors as wrong. That doesn't mean it's not bigotry. It just means that particular form of it is enshrined into your worldview as an unchangeable constant of the universe. I would agree that we need to embrace that bigotry if your worldview is in fact reality, and that's a really long debate that I think people should be welcome to have (somewhere else).
When you're having a discussion with someone to find some agreed-upon truth, you have to start with some shared foundation which you already agree on. Your particular worldview of a Creator who proclaims homosexual behavior to be a sin is not a shared foundation for most of the people in this thread. To continue arguing (logically at least) that others should embrace this particular form of bigotry as a constant of the universe, you need to first back up to some shared foundation of belief and argue for those others to share your beliefs in that very specific view of God. Meanwhile what free-staters ought to have as a shared foundation from which to continue a discussion is some degree of small "l" libertarianism, and at the foundation of libertarianism is tolerance which is antithetical to bigotry. It's why we're here, after all.
To sum up, I feel that your arguments provide no support for these views not being bigotry. Your arguments are that this particular form of bigotry is completely justified because (your) God says so. And that's
incredibly analogous to historical arguments for racism and slavery. That was still bigotry then even as it was more accepted and this is still bigotry now. I really do think such speech is out of place here.
* It's important to note before you respond that bigotry is an attitude toward others, not necessarily based on action. For instance, you can be a very outspoken racist who believes blacks and whites and other races should segregate and never marry for their own good, but who doesn't want to enshrine racism into law or go out and burn crosses in people's lawns. You'd still not be welcome here (I think. Maybe I'm wrong and a moderator can correct me.) due to the atmosphere of intolerance that you would create on this forum with such outrageously bigoted opinions. And who knows if there aren't some people like that here? But they'd know to keep those opinions to themselves or at least to go have that discussion on the Stormfront forum where that kind of discussion is welcomed.