He advocates military tribunals against brown people and border security to keep brown people out. I haven't heard him advocate a Canadian border fence.
Maybe he doesn't hate brown people, but is just pandering to those who hate brown people, how about that?
Anyway, the guy is just another republican.
Now, most of that I can agree with . I am certain he has voted against this in the past, and recently(last year or so) on Alex Jones he got into a quibble with AJ about this very thing as AJ advocates a Militarized Border fence- RP does not. I am completely against "border fences", not because there aren't some people who should be kept out, but rather that I am quite aware that fences also are used to keep people in- and that means ALL of us. Putting up a fence will also not do anything about why people- particularly the ones that actually are a problem, meaning those that are cashing in on the morally corrupt policy of making things that people want illegal- are entering the country and are dangerous 100% because of this policy. Not to mention the fact that the very Government that makes these laws to divide our society by creating an "us and them" mentality and weaken it by locking up completely innocent (morally) victims of this tyranny also has our Military protecting poppy fields in Afghanistan (and probably helping to ship it here and to Europe) and also shipping in tons of Cocaine (Proven fact).
Keep in mind that Ron & Rand Paul both advocate changing the corrupt policies relating to Drug Laws, and that is a check in the "Pros" column for them in my book.
I am curious about the claim that either Rand or Ron advocate using "military tribunals against brown people". Do you mean that he/they are advocating this to be specifically targeted at 'brown people", or that he/they support the concept of "military tribunals" in general? If this is indeed true , and not a whole lot about politicians surprises me anymore, could you please direct me to where you got that information?