If NH is picked I'll probably have to rent a room from some noble, altruistic Libertarian.... The housing prices are way to expensive for many Libertarians.
Are Libertarians poorer than other groups? Why?
I am perplexed by the belief that NH is somehow "unaffordable." NH, like all the candidate states, has a wide selection of housing for purchase and rent and just about every price level. Do incoming residents plan on not having jobs or something?
This points to one of the single biggest disconnects I've percieved in this forum. There is a whole lot of gung-ho about moving and creating strategic plans for placing people throughout the state, and/or liberating a single county with 2,000 people, etc. Such schemes are completely impractical given the reality that most members need decent jobs, and the location of these jobs will largely dictate where they can practically reside. I suspect many here are college students and young adults that don't fully appreciate the demands that full time employment will have, nor on how hard it will be to find quality jobs.
Your job/career will take at least as much of your time/energy as your activism. It will because you need to eat and pay rent. You need to have a little fun too.
My biggest fear is that Wyoming advocates will have convinced our young members that they ought to choose Wyoming on the basis of technically-sound, but practically unsound criteria. Wyoming is, absolutely, the best chance of success for the FSP, so long as we're not dealing with reality. But our young members, many who will be our most energetic activists, need places where they can start careers, and where they are near more young adults. If we choose Wyoming, it will disenfranchise many people under the age of 25, many of whom will find it unlivable.
I imagine my life in Wyoming consists of wasting two hours each day driving to/from Cheyenne and my job in Fort Collins (the only place I have any real hope of finding a job) upon the desolate southeast Wyoming landscape, and I get to pay Colorado's 4.63% income tax to boot. That doesn't sound like freedom to me!
