Free State Project Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Pages: [1] 2 3   Go Down

Author Topic: Gun Laws:(or Rather, a lack there of) Improving in New Hampshire?  (Read 8796 times)

lordpoee

  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 323
    • Murray Computer Science Group
Gun Laws:(or Rather, a lack there of) Improving in New Hampshire?
« on: September 14, 2005, 07:13:30 am »

According to OpenCarry.org, Kentucky is more Gun-Friendly than New Hamsphire.

http://www.opencarry.org/

Hopefully we can make New Hampshire a Gold Star state too.

Kentucky has Peaceable journey laws, You may carry your firearm in Your Glove Box or any place in the vehicle that is clearly visible. This right is observed for non-residents as well.
« Last Edit: September 25, 2005, 07:28:55 pm by lordpoee »
Logged

KBCraig

  • FSP Participant
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1466
Re: Gun Laws:(or rtaher, a lcak there of) Improving in New Hampshire?
« Reply #1 on: September 14, 2005, 11:29:27 am »

According to OpenCarry.org, Kentucky is more Gun-Friendly than New Hamsphire.

http://www.opencarry.org/

That's all relative, and http://www.packing.org/state/kentucky/ shows some differences.

KY honors all states' carry licenses; NH honors 18. Advantage, KY
KY licenses cost $60; NH costs $10. Advantage, NH
KY licenses must be applied for in person; NH can use mail. Advantage, NH
KY minimum age 21; NH, age 18. Advantage, NH
KY has a long list of places where it's prohibited to carry; NH only prohibits carry in a "courtroom or area used by a court". Advantage, NH

The laws and rulings cited at the packing.org page show some trickiness when it comes to unlicensed carry in KY: "A loaded handgun can be carried in the glove box. It is not necessary for you to lock your weapon in the trunk when you are in Kentucky. It may be carried in your glove compartment. It may be loaded. You may also travel with your weapon on the seat or dash of your vehicle as long as the weapon is completely visible. It may not be transported under a seat, in a console or in a drawer in the vehicle." Also, "A console is not a glove box."

Kevin
Logged

lordpoee

  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 323
    • Murray Computer Science Group
Re: Gun Laws:(or rtaher, a lcak there of) Improving in New Hampshire?
« Reply #2 on: September 14, 2005, 06:01:58 pm »

Yes I read about that ruling concerning "The console is not a Glove Box" this is a prime examples of Gun Laws that are designed to trick people. Carrying the Gun in the Console (according to the ruling) was an honest mistake.

I see alot of advantages of NH, but I also see some things that must be changed. (Carrying a pistol, which purpose is to protect you...in the trunk of your car? Excuse me Carjacker while I remove my pistol from the trunk, won't you?)

New Hampshire is my Idea of Utopia. These sort of realties bring it crashing down...

We HAVE to get Absolute firearms freedom in New Hampshire. Absolute.
Logged

KBCraig

  • FSP Participant
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1466
Re: Gun Laws:(or rtaher, a lcak there of) Improving in New Hampshire?
« Reply #3 on: September 15, 2005, 12:22:49 am »

New Hampshire is my Idea of Utopia. These sort of realties bring it crashing down...

We HAVE to get Absolute firearms freedom in New Hampshire. Absolute.

Alaska-style carry came close to passing last year. We need more people in NH to help sway the vote.

Kevin
Logged

lordpoee

  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 323
    • Murray Computer Science Group
Re: Gun Laws:(or rtaher, a lcak there of) Improving in New Hampshire?
« Reply #4 on: September 15, 2005, 10:08:15 am »

I read about Lych ousting Craig Benson. Wasn't Craig Benson a friend to Libertarians and the FSP? Is lynch a friend of the FSP?
Logged

citizen_142002

  • Friend of the FSP
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 490
  • I'm a llama!
Re: Gun Laws:(or rtaher, a lcak there of) Improving in New Hampshire?
« Reply #5 on: September 22, 2005, 05:14:16 pm »

A correction to post #2, NH has no minimum concealed carry age. I personally know a 17 year old license holder.
Logged

lordpoee

  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 323
    • Murray Computer Science Group
Re: Gun Laws:(or rtaher, a lcak there of) Improving in New Hampshire?
« Reply #6 on: September 24, 2005, 09:38:33 pm »

That is  good too. I think sixteen of seventeen CAN be a responsible age to carry. That should be left up to the parents to determined weather or not their child is responsible enough. I would however believe that in this generation, few parents would.
Logged

citizen_142002

  • Friend of the FSP
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 490
  • I'm a llama!
Re: Gun Laws:(or rtaher, a lcak there of) Improving in New Hampshire?
« Reply #7 on: September 25, 2005, 07:08:07 pm »

There is no parental consent requirement. Like it or not.

Logged

lordpoee

  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 323
    • Murray Computer Science Group
Re: Gun Laws:(or Rather, a lack there of) Improving in New Hampshire?
« Reply #8 on: September 25, 2005, 07:30:24 pm »

I don't neccesarily disagree.

Anywho, here is an example of what I was talking about, check out this thread that I posetd.

http://forum.freestateproject.org//index.php?topic=10922.0
Logged

MaineShark

  • FSP Participant
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5044
Re: Gun Laws:(or rtaher, a lcak there of) Improving in New Hampshire?
« Reply #9 on: September 25, 2005, 07:48:49 pm »

There is no parental consent requirement. Like it or not.

Almost correct.  Last I checked, minors were required to have parental consent to own firearms.  So, while a minor could obtain a permit without parental consent, it would be purely an academic matter without it.

Joe
Logged
"An armed society is a polite society" - this does not mean that we are polite because we fear each other.

We are not civilized because we are armed; we are armed because we are civilized..

lordpoee

  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 323
    • Murray Computer Science Group
Re: Gun Laws:(or Rather, a lack there of) Improving in New Hampshire?
« Reply #10 on: September 25, 2005, 08:39:08 pm »

Bingo. Permit without consent doesn't bother me.

But it should still be up to parents weather or not their son or daughter can own a firearm. When I was sixteen I kept an SKS under my bed and I never did harm to anyone.
Logged

Tracy Saboe

  • FSP Participant
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3859
    • Rand for US Senate in Kentucky!
Re: Gun Laws:(or rtaher, a lcak there of) Improving in New Hampshire?
« Reply #11 on: September 30, 2005, 10:09:52 pm »

That is  good too. I think sixteen of seventeen CAN be a responsible age to carry. That should be left up to the parents to determined weather or not their child is responsible enough. I would however believe that in this generation, few parents would.

It used to be a right of passage for a 12-year-old boy to carry his gun with him to school.

Tracy
Logged
We agree that "Government is not reason; it is not eloquent; it is force. Like fire, it is a dangerous servant and a fearful master. Never for a moment should it be left to irresponsible action." --George Washington

Jack Conway

Conway Supports Obamacare
Conway Supports Cap and Trade
Conway Supports Abortion
Conway’s Utilities Rate Hike Scandal
Conway is in Bed with Big Pharma
Conway is Backed by Wall Street Bankers

artienewport

  • FSP Participant
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 164
Re: Gun Laws:(or rtaher, a lcak there of) Improving in New Hampshire?
« Reply #12 on: October 01, 2005, 07:52:34 am »

We HAVE to get Absolute firearms freedom in New Hampshire. Absolute.

How many statists do you think you can convert to freedom?
Logged

MaineShark

  • FSP Participant
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5044
Re: Gun Laws:(or rtaher, a lcak there of) Improving in New Hampshire?
« Reply #13 on: October 01, 2005, 10:08:19 am »

How many statists do you think you can convert to freedom?

I honestly don't care if they are "converted to freedom."  They don't have to care one whit about my rights, so long as they don't infringe upon them.

Joe
Logged
"An armed society is a polite society" - this does not mean that we are polite because we fear each other.

We are not civilized because we are armed; we are armed because we are civilized..

artienewport

  • FSP Participant
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 164
Re: Gun Laws:(or rtaher, a lcak there of) Improving in New Hampshire?
« Reply #14 on: October 01, 2005, 12:34:20 pm »

They don't have to care one whit about my rights, so long as they don't infringe upon them.

But "they" already don't care, are the majority, and...as you might have noticed...are already infringing on them.

I mean, the amount of people against MEDICAL marijuana alone is staggering. You think open carry would survive in NH if it was put up to a vote?
Logged
Pages: [1] 2 3   Go Up