Free State Project Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Pages: 1 2 [3]   Go Down

Author Topic: Why the FSP Should Consider Just 6 States: Analysis of State Spreadsheet  (Read 9195 times)

Kelton

  • FSP Participant
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 604
  • el resplandor de las llamas de la libertad
Re:Why the FSP Should Consider Just 6 States: Analysis of State Spreadsheet
« Reply #30 on: August 05, 2003, 12:22:14 am »


If we had culled those four before, they wouldn't be giving us so much trouble now.


I just looked at the old report written by Jason Sorens that started this thread, if the research committe had taken this advice, almost one year ago, and it had been approved by the membership, we would now have the following states:

Alaska, Idaho, Montana,  New Hampshire, Vermont, Delaware

Logged
. . .the foundations of our national policy should be laid in private morality. If individuals be not influenced by moral principles, it is in vain to look for public virtue --The U.S. Senate's reply to George Washington's first inaugural address

Sebastian

  • FSP Participant
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 535
  • Elderado
Re:Why the FSP Should Consider Just 6 States: Analysis of State Spreadsheet
« Reply #31 on: August 05, 2003, 08:30:05 am »

I would've missed Wyoming.
Logged
Ask not what your country can do for you, but what you can do for yourself.
Pages: 1 2 [3]   Go Up