Free State Project Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: National Geographic different from what we thought.  (Read 2388 times)

Tracy Saboe

  • FSP Participant
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3859
    • Rand for US Senate in Kentucky!
National Geographic different from what we thought.
« on: March 29, 2005, 02:46:03 am »

There's no need to boycott the National Geographic I don't think.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

We have heard from a number of people concerned about National
Geographic’s treatment of home-schooled children in our annual
geography
Bee competition because of an incident that recently occurred in New
Hampshire. Some correspondents are under the misconception that the
Society has “banned” home schoolers from the event. That is not the
case.  This year, as every year, the competition is open to children
pursuing their educations at home as well as in public, private and
parochial schools.

Unfortunately, a home-schooled young man in New Hampshire was
disqualified because 2005 protocols were not followed in his case. His
parents, as well as the teacher who administered the exam, acknowledge
that the rules were not reviewed in advance. Much as we regret any
situation that deprives a child of the opportunity to participate,
National Geographic can’t be responsible for any failure to follow
the
contest’s rules and procedures. They exist to ensure that all
children
are treated equally and fairly.  And to make an exception after the
fact
could be unfair to other students who abided by those rules.

13,000 tests have been submitted, and of those, only 32 have been
disqualified for issues related to rules compliance. Thirty of the 32
tests were from public, private or parochial schools, leaving only two
disqualified home students. That statistic suggests that the vast
majority of students, parents and teachers understood the process.

We have worked hard over the course of our 17 years administering the
competition to run it in a way that treats each and every child with
fairness and respect. We continuously review our protocols for the
competition, based on input from educators, parents and the children
themselves. While those changes are described on our website and
included in the entry materials, we will strive to make any subsequent
modifications and improvements even clearer in years to come.

Thank you for taking the time to share your concerns.



Renee' M. Kelly
Publicist
National Geographic Society
Communications Department
202-775-6190
Logged
We agree that "Government is not reason; it is not eloquent; it is force. Like fire, it is a dangerous servant and a fearful master. Never for a moment should it be left to irresponsible action." --George Washington

Jack Conway

Conway Supports Obamacare
Conway Supports Cap and Trade
Conway Supports Abortion
Conway’s Utilities Rate Hike Scandal
Conway is in Bed with Big Pharma
Conway is Backed by Wall Street Bankers

Toowm

  • First 1000
  • FSP Participant
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 257
Re: National Geographic different from what we thought.
« Reply #1 on: March 29, 2005, 10:28:56 am »

But the current leadership of National Geographic has taken the organization away from the natural world into a PC direction.

http://www.cato.org/pub_display.php?pub_id=2813

I think the homeschooling flap is emblematic of NG's desire to fit in the current political orthodoxy, which is what porc's are seeking to change.
Logged
toowm
Porc -- The Other, Other White Meat
Pages: [1]   Go Up