Free State Project Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: Taxes - Defend against IRS Abuse  (Read 7402 times)

Luck

  • FSP Participant
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2369
Taxes - Defend against IRS Abuse
« on: February 02, 2013, 07:13:44 pm »

Last post is the most recent.

[Following is the Contents page etc from a book of tactics for "govt" to use against patriots in court. I don't know how old the book is, but it looks like a real book. It was just recently uploaded to scribd.com. A few of what they label "anti-govt" websites are listed here at the bottom. - Luck]

Anti-Government Movement Guidebook
http://www.scribd.com/doc/122490811/The-Anti-Government-Guidebook-for-Judges
This guide was developed under a grant. Award No. SJI-96-02B-B-159, "The Rise of Common Law Courts in the United States: An Examination of the Movement, The Potential Impact on the Judiciary, and How the States Could Respond," from the State Justice Institute. The points of view expressed are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position or policies of the State Justice Institute.

- STAFF; Managing Editor; Mr. Chuck Ericksen;  Acting Executive Director Institute for Court Management National Center for State Courts
- Contributors and Primary Researchers:
Mr. Chris J. Wesser, J.D.;  College of William and Mary, Williamsburg, Virginia; Mr. Dov M. Szego, J.D.; College of William and Mary Williamsburg, Virginia; Project Staff National Center for State Courts; 300 Newport Avenue, Williamsburg, Virginia 22185(757) 253--20000; Ms. Catina N. Burrell; Senior Administrative Specialist; Ms. Amanda
C. Murer;  Intern
- Research Assistants:
Shawn Shurden, Koran Singh, Stuart Turner, Funding Agency, Ms. Cheryl Reynolds, Grant Manager;  State Justice Institute, 1650 King Street, Suite 600, Alexandria, Virginia 22314703-684-7618
- PROJECT ADVISORY COMMITTEE
Mr. Chuck Ericksen; State Judicial Educator, Office of the State Court Administrator, Olympia, Washington; Mr. Peter Haskel, Esquire; Assistant Division Chief, Financial Litigation Division, Office of the Attorney General, Austin, Texas; Honorable Joanne Huelsman; State Senator, Madison, Wisconsin; Honorable Jeffrey H. Langton; Judge, 21st Judicial District Court, Hamilton, Montana; Mr. Thomas McAffee;  Professor of Law, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, Illinois; Mr. Nick Murnion, Esquire; District Attorney, Garfield County Prosecutor's Office, Jordan, Montana; Ms. Cheryl Reynolds; State Justice Institute, Alexandria, Virginia; Mr. Stephan W. Stover; State Court Administrator, Supreme Court of Ohio, Columbus, Ohio
- Table of Contents
Preface...viii
Acknowledgements..............................................................................................x
Part I
Common Law and Uncommon Courts: 1
An Overview of the Common Law Court Movement................................................1
The Posse Comitatus........................................................................................... 3
Avoiding Legal Authority................................................................................... 5
"Hidden History" as Justification........................................................................ 6
The Posse and the Common Law........................................................................ 9
The First Wave of the Common Law Movement............................................... 14
Decline and Resurgence...................................................................................... 19
The Future of Common Law Courts?.....................................................…......... 29
Part II
Tactics in the Courtroom.............................................................................................. 31
Subpart 2.1
Challenging Subject Matter Jurisdiction.................................................... 32
A. The Gold-Fringed Flag Issue..................................................…................... 32
B. Typical Responses to the Flag Objection...................................................... 33
C. Additional Authority..........................................................…........................ 34
Subpart 2.2 - Challenging Personal Jurisdiction............................................................... 35
A. The "Sovereign" vs. the "Corporate" Citizen....…........................................ 35
B. Typical Responses to the Personal Jurisdiction Issue.................................... 36
C. Additional Authority............................. ........................................................ 38
Subpart 2.3 - Demanding Use of "The Common Law"...............…................................. 39
Anti-Government Movement Guidebook
A. Demanding a Strict Interpretation of "Common Law"...…........................... 39
B. Typical Responses to the Common Law Demand.......….............................. 40
Subpart 2.4 - Significance of "The Bar"..................................…..................................... 42
A.   Refusing to Enter the Bar....................................................…....................... 42
B.   Typical Responses to the Bar Argument............................…........................ 43
C.   Additional Authority............................ ......................................................... 44
Part III
Disrupting the Operation of the Court....................................................................... 46
Subpart 3.1 - Refusing to Speak/Identify Oneself............................................................ 47
A. Refusal to Identify Oneself............................................................................ 47
B. Typical Responses to Refusals to Identify..................................................... 48
Subpart 3.2 - Silence/Filibuster......................................................................................... 50
A. Party Chooses to Remain Silent or Party Chooses
to "Filibuster"................................................................................................. 50
B. Typical Responses to Silence/Filibuster.............................……................... 50
C. Additional Authority...............................................…................................... 51
Subpart 3.3 - Demanding "Counsel of Choice"................................................................ 52
A. Party Requests to be Represented by a Non-Lawyer..................................... 52
B. Responding to Requests to be Represented
by a Non-Lawyer........................................................................................... 53
Subpart 3.4 - Verbal Threats Against the Court............................................................... 54
A. Party Makes Verbal Threats Against the Court............................................. 54
B. Responding to Threats Made by Members of the Movement........................ 54
Subpart 3.5 - Hunger Strikes............................................................................................. 56
A. Party Begins a Hunger Strike......................................................................... 56
B. Responding to a Hunger Strike...................................................................... 56
Subpart 3.6 - Attempts to Disqualify the Judge................................................................ 57
A. Judicial Disqualification.....................................................…....................... 57
B. Typical Responses to Judicial Disqualification or Recusal.....…….............. 58
Subpart 3.7 - Forms of Pleadings...................................................................................... 60
A. Party Files "Odd" Documents/Uses Antiquated
Pleading Forms.............................................................................................. 60
B. Responding to Unusual Documents............................................................... 61
Subpart 3.8 - Refusal to Sign Documents......................................................................... 63
A. Party Refuses to Sign Documents..................................…............................ 63
B. Responding to a Party's Refusal to Sign Documents..................................... 63
« Last Edit: November 23, 2017, 02:08:11 pm by Luck »
Logged

Luck

  • FSP Participant
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2369
Re: Statist Tactics vs Patriots in Court
« Reply #1 on: February 02, 2013, 07:15:55 pm »

(Cont.)

Part IV
Tactics Outside of the Courtroom........................................................................... 65
Subpart 4.1 - Interactions with the Clerk.......................................................................... 66
A. Appearance at Office/Window/Counter of Court Clerk................................ 66
B. Clerk Responses to Members of the Movement............................................ 67
Subpart 4.2 - Actions Against Court Personnel................................................................ 69
A. Service of Process/Personal Suits Against Court Personnel....…...….......... 69
B. Responses to Service of Process/Personal Suits...........…….….................... 69
C. Additional Authority...................................................................................... 70
Subpart 4.3 - Threats Against Court Personnel...........................…................................. 72
A. Threats Against Court Personnel................................................................... 72
B. Clerk/Personnel Responses............................................................................ 72
Subpart 4.4 - Violent Actions........................................................................................... 74
Anti-Government Movement Guidebook
A. Members of the Movement Become Violent................................................. 74
B. Clerk Responses............................................................................................. 74
Part V
Trial Court Performance Standards............................................................................ 75
Relationship Between Responses and the TCPS.............................................................. 78
Appendix A - Resource Guide... 81
1. Legislative Responses.................................................................................... 81
2. Helpful Websites............................................................................................ 95
3. List Serve................................................................…................................... 95
Appendix B - Movement Sources................................................................................................ 96
1. Movement web pages..............................................….................................. 96
Appendix C
 
Movement Documents.......................................................................................... 97
1. Tactics... 97
2. Briefs/Filings.................................................................................................. 117
3. Movement Manifestos................................................................................... 133
4. Of Note... 182

96 Appendix B: Movement Sources
1. Movement web pages
Note: This is a short list of representative sites relevant to the movement. Given the nature of both the medium and the movement, the addresses change all the time, and entire sites may move from server to server. Many of these links may be broken by the time the reader looks for them, but a search at any of the major search engines (www.yahoo.com, www.excite.com, www.infoseek.com, etc.) will reveal a plethora of similar sites. Also, a number of the sites in appendix D will have lists of such sites readily available and categorized, not unlike these pages, only hotlinked, so as to be more convenient to use. Anyone interested in or threatened by the movement should regularly canvass the web, so as to see the movement's new developments.
1.1 Patriots
The Freedom Page http://freedompage.home.mindspring.com/ 
American Patriot Network www.civil-liberties.com/
National Organization for Non-Enumeration www.noneusa.org
1.2 Militias
Information on militias www.well.com/user/srhodes/militia.html
Texas Militia Papers www.constitution.org/mil/tmp.htm
Posse Comitatus www.posse-comitatus.org/ 
1.3 Tax Protestors
Tax truth 4 you www.taxtruth4u.com/ 
Bill Conklin's ‘Anti-IRS.com’ www.anti-irs.com/ 
‘Taxgate.com’ www.taxgate.com/ 
Logged

powersupplyguy

  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 63
Re: Another Scary Statist Threat to Our Sovereignty?
« Reply #2 on: February 17, 2013, 10:18:45 am »

Very interesting stuff.  Thank you Luck.
Logged

Luck

  • FSP Participant
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2369

Stewart Rhodes
Sheriff Mack
Brandon Smith  
at
Freedom Law School's 2013 Freedom Conference

(See "Legally Beat IRS Assessments and Collections" halfway down.)
 
Stewart Rhodes, Oath Keepers Founder
 From Oath Keepers' national website -
 
Sheriff Mack, Brandon Smith, and Stewart Rhodes will each make presentations at this Conference. Stewart Rhodes will speak in the Saturday afternoon slot and again at the Saturday evening banquette. Sheriff Mack will speak Sunday afternoon. Additionally, Southern California Oath Keepers will have a booth for RT&I.  
 
Here is an update from the organizers -
 
 
"The 2013 Freedom Rally is the only event of its kind in the United States. Freedom Law School gathers the best freedom minded speakers from around the country. This year's lineup includes:
    Paul Armenatno - NORML
    Christina Heller - Libertopia Film
    Jayel Aheram - Young Americans for Liberty
    Joe Banister - Freedom Above Fortune
    ...Many many more!
Also attending this year will be Stewart Rhodes of the Oath Keepers. He will go on at 4:00PM on Saturday March 9th, and he will also do the introduction for the Saturday evening banquet dinner.
Freedom Law School also secured Brandon Smith from Alt-Marketing.com to speak on Sunday March 10th at 9:20AM.
Check out www.FreedomLawConference.org for last minute registration, and call Freedom Law School at 760-868-4271 if you need more information."

* Note: The brochure and pdf are not complete and some changes in itinerary are not posted, such as the appearances by Stewart Rhodes. Stewart Rhodes will speak Saturday afternoon and again at the Saturday evening banquette.
 
There is an impressive lineup of freedom advocates and activists, including Ernest Hancock of Freedom's Phoenix.
 
For the full brochure done as a web page, learn details here: http://freedomlawconference.org/
Brochure as 'pdf':  http://freedomlawconference.org/downloads/Conference_Brochure.pdf
Freedom Law School's web site:  http://www.livefreenow.org/index.php  
 
* Freedom Law School's Freedom Conference basic schedule:
 
March 8-11, Friday-Monday
Location: Ontario, CA | 909-937-8000
Sheraton Ontario Airport
429 North Vineyard Avenue
Ontario, CA 91764
 
This 4-day event includes a seminar on how to "Legally Beat IRS Assessments and Collections" featuring Donald Macpherson (BeatIRS.com).  We will also have 10 of the most exciting Freedom speakers in the country, a seminar on "Stopping Home Mortgage Fraud", another seminar titled "No Income? No Money? No Tax Return? No Problem!", which will show you how to make money in real estate during these hard times, and we are also proud to announce that Freedom Law School has confirmed Vice Presidential Candidate Jim Gray as our keynote banquet speaker. Register today, and don't miss out!
 
Friday March 8th, starting at 9 AM, will feature an 8-hour class on Legally Beat IRS Assmessments and Collections. This class will be put on by Peymon Mottahedeh, President and Founder of Freedom Law School, and and one of the best Freedom attorneys in the country Donald MacPherson from BeatIRS.com. Learn to beat an IRS audit and win in Tax Court, Collection Due Process Hearings, bankruptcy cases, refund lawsuits, and even have the IRS pay for your audit and court costs after you beat them.
 
Saturday March 9th will feature our keynote banquet speaker for the evening:
Judge Gray was the Vice Presidential Nominee for the Libertarian Party in the 2012 election. Judge Gray is a native Californian and is a respected author and jurist. Judge Gray will discuss the Libertarian platform him and Governor Gary Johnson ran on, and what we can do as Americans to move forward and release ourselves for the shackles of the two major parties and go forth with real candidates with real solutions.
 
Monday March 11th from 9 AM - 12 PM features a seminar on Stop Home Mortgage Fraud. This is a new information that you must have if you are a home owner.
    Learn how the US Banks have been defrauding American homeowners, like you, and destroying the home mortgage notes that obligate you to make monthly payments to the bank and their investors.
    What you can do to prevent/stop bank home foreclosures and regain your good credit, even if you stopped making monthly home mortgage payments.
    You will also learn how to legally own your home free and clear of government intrusion.
Monday March 11th from 2pm - 5pm a class on No Income? No Money? No Tax Return? No Problem!
Presented by Peymon Mottahedeh, President and Founder of Freedom Law School
    Learn how to own your home and make money in real estate. You will learn how to do this even if you don't have any income, savings or even a tax return. This class will also cover privacy and estate planning.

*Here at Freedom Law School we want to connect Patriots. If you want to attend, but are worried about the cost of a room, no worries! Freedom Law School will get you in contact with other Patriots attending so you can work out splitting the cost of a room. Or if you're in the Southern California area, want to attend, but can't find transportation, we will help you get in contact with someone also commuting to share a ride with. Contact Freedom Law School at the number below for more details!
Freedom Law School | (760) 868-4271
« Last Edit: March 09, 2013, 04:02:24 pm by Luck »
Logged

Luck

  • FSP Participant
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2369

Oops, the previous post has the seminar info.


I decided to add this message, because it has more info on Freedom Law School that will still be up-to-date after the seminar.

Freedom Law School | (760) 868-4271
http://www.livefreenow.org/
Freedom Law School is part of Freedom Church
http://www.freedomchurch.org/

Defend yourself from IRS' aggression

What would it mean to truly say goodbye to the IRS? What would you do if April 15th was just another beautiful spring day?

We can teach you:

    Learn how to look up the law and never end up following baseless legal theories that are out there. This is where you can learn how to not get yourself in trouble by verifying somebody's theory.
    Learn legal procedures to protect your rights and freedom. Learning how the court system works and different legal procedures will increase your chances of winning the case. In fact, you can save some legal costs by doing some of the work for yourself.
    Learn how to defend yourself from aggressive state and federal income tax agencies. Knowing what to say and what to do is VERY IMPORTANT for the outcome of your case. Giving the wrong information and not knowing when to not talk can cause you to LOSE YOUR case.
    Stop funding the enemies of American People who have taken control of America's political process and are destroying America and our freedoms.

Don't have the time to study, need help fighting the government's attack now?

Freedom Law School hosts a FREE weekly conference call every Tuesday night at 6PM Pacific Time. The number is (712) 432-3900, conference room number is 460421. Ask any questions you have regarding: Freedom, government and bureaucratic abuse, law, your rights, IRS issues, state tax issues, traffic tickets, judges, politicians…

If you have an urgent tax or government harassment problem, quickly give us a call at (760) 868-4271 or e-mail us. Since 1992, we have helped hundreds of individuals fend off IRS and government agencies' harassment.

For more information about the courses and services that we provide, request your Free Information Packet!


-----

June 15, 2013

Yesterday on Fox I heard discussion of ending the IRS and replacing Income Tax with national Sales Tax, or something like that.

It looks like that may be why they've been highlighting the IRS's unfairness toward Tea Party members in the major media. It's just part of their scheme to replace a tax that increasing numbers of people aren't paying (close to 50% I think I heard) with a tax that they won't be able to avoid paying without great difficulty.

Ain't that great?

"Legally Beat IRS Assessments and Collections" etc
« Last Edit: September 26, 2016, 06:18:11 pm by Luck »
Logged

Luck

  • FSP Participant
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2369
Legally Beat IRS via Title 15?
« Reply #5 on: May 01, 2014, 03:26:06 pm »

This website http://keystoliberty2.wordpress.com/ explains possibly how to stop the IRS via Title 15, which requires them to prove the assessment of a debt, which they can't do because it's a bluff from the start. By not demanding proof of assessment, the "taxpayer" acknowledges that the assessment is correct, that the debt exists.

-----

Heard of this Fascist IRS Scam?  (Read 1441 times)
Luck

« on: May 17, 2014, 09:32:14 pm »
   
There's a restaurant (I'll call it X) in Illinois that has a bar. The IRS sent X a statement claiming $3,000 is owed from 11 years ago. If X doesn't pay the IRS that money, IRS says X won't be able to have the liquor license renewed.

The law in Illinois requires businesses to keep their records for 7 years, so X doesn't keep records for longer than that. So X can't prove they don't owe what the IRS claims.

Has anyone heard of similar IRS scams? Ain't this a great Fascist country?

I plan to inform X about Joe Bannister and about Kris Anne Hall. I think it was Kris who said recently that Title 15 has the instructions for handling the IRS properly, instead of Title 26.

---

« Reply #1 on: May 17, 2014, 09:54:53 pm »
   
I just checked online for IRS scams and I see there have been many scams by phone and email all over the country, but I don't know if X were contacted by phone or by regular mail. If it was by mail, I suppose it was truly from the IRS. So I'll ask to see how the threat was received.
John Edward Mercier

---

« Reply #2 on: May 18, 2014, 12:31:43 am »
   
I don't think it is the IRS. Unless of course they have already been audited and found to owe back taxes in the past.
The liquor license would be the State.
lildog

---

« Reply #3 on: May 20, 2014, 03:23:04 pm »
   
Quote from: Luck on May 17, 2014, 09:54:53 pm
I just checked online for IRS scams and I see there have been many scams by phone and email all over the country, but I don't know if X were contacted by phone or by regular mail. If it was by mail, I suppose it was truly from the IRS. So I'll ask to see how the threat was received.

I actually received one of these scam calls this week.  They called up attempting to sound all official stating they were with the IRS and rattled off some bogus claim ID number stating my wife and I owed X amount and attempted to ask detailed questions including asking for my social security number.  Of course I didn't answer any of the questions and contacted the authorities after the call.  Based on some of the questions they were asking, I'm guessing they thought I was my father because he and I have the same name and they were hoping to catch a confused scared old person and convince them to send money to a random PO address and/or get information they could use to fake IDs and create credit card accounts.
Anonymous

---

« Reply #4 on: May 21, 2014, 07:06:40 pm »
   
Quote from: John Edward Mercier on May 18, 2014, 12:31:43 am
I don't think it is the IRS. Unless of course they have already been audited and found to owe back taxes in the past.
The liquor license would be the State.
I found out they were contacted through the mail by the IRS. I didn't see it myself. But they then called a Congressman, who suggested that the mail was official, so they went ahead and paid the supposed debt, but they are also contacting an attorney. I hope they will contact Joe Bannister or Kris Anne Hall or anyone else who understands the IRS illegitimacy and its fascist history etc.
John Edward Mercier

---

« Reply #5 on: May 22, 2014, 01:31:33 pm »
   
I was speaking about this...
http://www.ehow.com/info_7742201_long-keep-business-tax-records.html

Unless they failed a previous audit, or owed for employee withholding, I think they got scammed.

They should have had a file number to call a Special Agent and verify with the audit.
Planethosting

---

« Reply #6 on: May 22, 2014, 08:10:01 pm »
   
Have you heard about the biggest scam perhaps in the history of the world?  It's called the IRS.

From Babylon, to Samaria, to Egypt, to now Rome, with the aid of The City of London, the District of Columbia, and hooded spirits such as the one they call Lucifer...we are being ruled spiritually, emotionally, mentally, and then physically.  Less so if you understand the true source, nature, and techniques of 'spell casting' by our oppressors.  We are defeated in the spirit realm, first, because many don't believe in the power of, or understand, such things...unlike our rulers, who are the most powerful spiritual organization on the planet, and represent the absolute darkness and proliferation of the occult.
John Edward Mercier

---

« Reply #7 on: May 23, 2014, 01:20:25 am »
   
Department of the US Treasury - Bureau of Internal Revenue.

It is just a tax collector for the Congress.
Anonymous
« Last Edit: September 26, 2016, 06:24:31 pm by Luck »
Logged

Luck

  • FSP Participant
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2369
How to End Taxes
« Reply #6 on: February 09, 2016, 01:18:37 am »

4951
No Taxes Now
The Original Spark of the 'American' Revolution
http://NoTaxesNow.org

Our Real Forefathers were in the Process of Eliminating ALL TAXATION.
Welcome to the Return of Real Patriotic Revolution
Welcome to the Return of The Commonwealth

Eric WhoRU Williams' Proposed 28th Amendment to the U.S.CONstitution that will Eliminate All Taxation. Instead of taxes being used to pay interest to the international bankers, interest should be used to pay all the taxes.

Benjamin Franklin knew this when he printed colonial scrip for the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. That's what a real American Commonwealth was. ... They had taxes back then, but the Commonwealths were on their way to eliminating all of them. The colonial scrip was good sound currency because the scrip was actually backed up by property. When the English Parliament outlawed the colonial scrip, the American reaction was the spark that lit the fuse to the American insurrection of 1776. But it wasn't so much that the crown wasn't getting their money, it was the fact that the international bankers weren't getting theirs. That's why the bankers sent the Hessian soldiers over here to help the British crown crush the insurrection. Then the founding scoundrels, the Masonic Lodge members and other international banker's men destroyed the Commonwealths when they wrote the U.S. CONstitution. It prohibited the states from emitting bills of credit. It has been debt and taxation ever since.

It's now 2009. It's time to bring control of the money system back to the people. A money system that will eliminate all taxation with changes to the mortgage system so that mortgage payments are not front end interest loaded. A mortgage system that is simple interest, not compound interest. A way to enable the average homeowner to pay off their house in 8 to 10 years. It is interesting to note that no one that I have ever known, including myself, knew what the Commonwealths were all about until we started digging....

It's time for NoTaxesNow.org. True Freedom Begins With Monetary Sovereignty. A people cannot truly be free, as long as they are required to pay taxes. As it stands now, the private owners of the Federal Reserve create the money of the United States by lending it out, at interest, which interest they then keep for themselves instead of using that interest to fund all four levels of government, which would allow the total elimination of all taxation in the entire Federation.

In examining this simple solution to the problems with the income tax and our money system, we must first lay out a few basic fundamental axioms, principles which ought to be self evident but which apparently, are not: Taxation is a euphemism for armed robbery. The solution presented below:
- will not require the elimination, or even the reduction, in any existing government programs: - Social Security - Medicare - Medicaid - Aid to Dependent Children - other government funded programs;
- nor will this solution require you to pay out any additional money to fund the government;
- nor is this solution taxation by another name.

The Solution in a Nut Shell: All we need to do to fix the problem is to have the ownership of the Federal Reserve taken over by the PEOPLE, while keeping the operation as distant from Congress as it currently is under private ownership. A Board of Governors of the central banking system, now owned by the People will remain in place, but doing it for the People of the United States instead of for the Fed's current private owners!!

The reason private ownership is the cause of the problems is simply because under private ownership, all of the interest collected on loans goes to the private owners of the Fed. Under the solution presented here, the interest will, instead, be credited to the Treasury of the United States government, to be used instead of taxation (armed robbery) to pay for all of the government programs currently funded by means of [taxation].

What is proposed here ... is to totally eliminate all taxation at every level of government in the entire United States. That is correct - no city, county or state sales taxes, property taxes, fuel (gasoline) taxes - that is NO TAXES of any nature whatever!!

In order to have a free flowing economy, a readily accessible money system must be utilized, people who borrow money expect to pay interest. Interest is the only voluntary source of revenue that anyone has been able to devise. Is it not, therefore, most reasonable that the interest voluntarily paid on such borrowed money should go to the Federal Treasury, to fund the Peoples government?? And it is most imperative that we do not allow the U.S. Congress or the President to have control over, or access to, the People's central bank!!

On This 11 Minute Video, Eric Examines The Substantial Benefits Possible When Paper Is Used as Money and examine the substantial economic pitfalls inherent in a monetary system where gold is used as money. Get the DVD from:
Eric Whoru, PO Box 413, Yellville, AR 72687

To review all of Eric's articles go to his Yahoo group at:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/whoru/

Ellen Brown says any state or local government can own a bank:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=2qxa8RnTueg
See also http://webofdebt.com
Then we can have our local governments get funds for providing government services from interest on loans from the government bank.
Logged

Luck

  • FSP Participant
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2369
Re: How to End Taxes (Replace Taxes with Interest on Loans)
« Reply #7 on: October 08, 2016, 12:44:37 am »

5648
Dozens arrested at India call center linked to IRS scam calls
http://abc27.com/2016/10/06/dozens-arrested-at-india-call-center-linked-to-irs-scam-calls
Logged

Luck

  • FSP Participant
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2369
Defend against IRS Abuse via Title 15, not 26
« Reply #8 on: November 23, 2017, 01:21:27 pm »

Defend against IRS Abuse via Title 15, not 26 - Part 1 of 6

[In May 2014 I referred to http://keystoliberty2.wordpress.com/ (in a post above.)

The information from that site is likely worth copying here. The page is called    
Freedom Documents, so there's info on other issues too, besides IRS.]

The IRS Title 15 Is Their Achilles Heel (Debt Validation) (part1)

Tuesday, 20 Nov 2012

Posted by eowyndbh (For Frank ‘Austin’ England III)

(Blog Master's Note: This is part 1 of 3, in part 2 & 3 will be affidavits and court cases. Before beginning, look at the IRS laws in the Code of Federal Regulations, there you will find the brackets around the authorization. Meaning the authorization has been omitted. But this is another remedy.)

(Proof of Validation of Debt)
I know someone who wishes to remain anonymous but wants his story out. I can attest to the hassles he went through with the IRS and know that it has been a long time since he has had to deal with them. Over a few years he has accumulated an enormous amount of documentation and had repeated communications with the IRS. They eventually dragged him into UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT and during the trial he changed his direction and used Title 15 instead of Title 26 and the Constitution. The case eventually stopped.

His new contention was simple and in some ways similar to my charge concept, it is all about the bill, not the law. Title 15 relates to “verified assessment”, in other words the collector must provide proof to validate the debt and any case involving debt must be held in the judicial district court. The concept is that the evil ones have circumvented the Constitution and use their law, Title 26, as a way to confuse their victims. Tax law does not apply, since the IRS is strictly a debt collection agency, thus they are required to follow Title 15. The IRS has no way to verify the debt, even if they can verify taxes. W-2’s and 1099’s are only evidence that someone has paid something, not that someone owes something.

After reading all of Title 15 Chapter 41 Sub V section 1692 I can see his point is valid. Knowing that IRS is by corporate charter and their own admission a debt collection agency, this all seems to make sense. I have started using this information in my own situation.... This man told me he sent one letter, received a very uninformative denial response and sent a response to that response. This was done during his trial. He has not heard anything since, which was over a year ago. His case was terminated with no decision. I looked it up and the court just says CLOSED AND SEALED. I have not seen a case terminated this way.

Conclusion: Once again it seems the evil one’s primary strategy is to get us to fight the wrong battle. Although Title 26 is the Internal Revenue Code, the IRS is just a collection agency and thereby is required to follow Title 15. If we don’t force them to verify the debt then we are agreeing the “bill” is valid. This, to me, is no different than the court tricking us into fighting an accusation when we should be fighting a charge.

Never enter into controversy by arguing the issues presented by the IRS -- no controversy created or offered on your part, no cause to move forward. As long as you are seeking discovery, as the above provides specifically, there is no controversy, and if they can’t honorably answer your inquiry, the matter is closed.

See CFR (Code of Federal Regulations), TITLE 15, CHAPTER 41, SUBCHAPTER V, §1692 "Congressional findings and declaration of purpose"
« Last Edit: November 26, 2017, 12:59:23 pm by Luck »
Logged

Luck

  • FSP Participant
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2369
Defend against IRS Abuse via Title 15, not 26
« Reply #9 on: November 23, 2017, 01:24:28 pm »

Defend against IRS Abuse via Title 15, not 26 - Part 2 of 6
(from Freedom Documents at http://keystoliberty2.wordpress.com/ )

The IRS Title 15 Is Their Achilles Heel (Debt Validation) Part 2
Sunday, 02 Dec 2012

Notice of Demand for Verified Assessment (to send to IRS etc)

XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

name and address

certified mail number ________________________

Linda E. Stiff, #  ,

Agent Name, # , IRS Title,

c/o LINDA E. STIFF,

Acting Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Internal Revenue Service

Room 5226

1111 Constitution Avenue, NW

Washington, D.C. 20224

Telephone:

Fax:

Agent Name, #, IRS Title

Mailing Address

City, State Zip

Date

RE:

Notice of Demand for Verified Assessment for Year 20–,
account # 000- 00- 0000;
Demand to Cease and Desist Abusive Collection Practices

Commissioner of Internal Revenue; Agent Name; To Whom This May Concern:

Commissioner, et al., “You” are herein demanded by the undersigned to verify that You, and Your delegates’, collection activities and performances are within Your official duties as the officer or employee or assignee of the United States Government; and specifically, 2) You are demanded by the undersigned to cause to be prepared and produced to the undersigned written verified assessment(s) concerning all alleged or presumed liability and thereby, outstanding debt for any and all taxable years currently in question re account # 000- 00- 0000, including, but not limited to, calendar year 20–; and, 20–) You are hereby noticed: You are not authorized to present yourself, or cause your delegate to take the liberty to appear at My dwelling(s) or work place(s) as such practice gives cause to intimidate Me, causes Me to suffer undue duress and distress and is absolutely unnecessary. Such presumptive and thereby, summary liberties are by their nature, abusive collection practices and recognized as such pursuant to U.S. federal and Oregon {or other} state law. 3) You are herein noticed that until You have duly provided to Me the herein referenced verified assessment(s) for any and all alleged liability and therefore alleged debt that all further activity by You or Your delegates, including, but not limited to, failed reimbursement of prior under color collections having not been verified by assessment, or the continued abuse of the collection process pursuant to Title 15 of an unverified liability or debt, is willful and abusive practice and categorically willful and direct violation of U.S. federal law and Oregon {or other} state law; and, 4) You are noticed that henceforth, I authorize You to contact Me only by mail at the mailing address above; and, 5) You have 30 business days to act in accordance with this demand, requiring substantive due process pursuant to Title 15 and in accordance with the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act.

I anticipate Your timely cooperation in remediation of the aforesaid alleged liability(s) and debt(s), the immediate cessation of abusive practices by You and Your delegates, and the appropriate prompt return of all personal property plus interest.
Notice to agent is notice to principal; notice to principal is notice to agent.

______________________________
Full Name

cc: (name), Acting Attorney General, U.S.
(name), Arizona {or other state's} Attorney General
(name), Director Arizona {or other state's} Department of Revenue

XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

Here is the affidavit I am sending.

XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

                           AFFIDAVIT By VERIFIED DECLARATION 

________________
)
)
(notary seal) ) ss
)
_______________)

To Whom it may concern: In the Matter for {Your Name Here}, including any and all derivations and variations in the spelling thereof.

WHEREAS, the public record is the highest form of evidence, I, {Your Name Here}, am hereby timely creating for the public record by this Affidavit and by Verified Declaration within the jurisdiction of (state) republic and the united States of America.

PLAIN STATEMENT OF FACTS

1. Fact: I, {Your Name Here}, have not seen or been presented with any substantive offer of proof or evidence which demonstrates that, primarily, the entity known as the INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE is anything other than a foreign entity, having its origin and headquarters in the territorial jurisdiction of the territory of Puerto Rico and thereby, being nothing more than a mere rogue collection agency employing agents to operate in the nature of privateers, while at all times, said agents are encouraged to presume to employ collection/prize measures in the form of Marque and Reprisal i.e. pillage and plunder in the said agent’s private and thereby personal capacity for the express purpose to unjustly enrich themselves;

2. Fact: I, {Your Name Here}, have not seen or been presented with any substantive offer of evidence which demonstrates the entity known as the INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE is in fact, a registered entity, not to be confused as the corporation registered in the State of Delaware circa 1933, and firmly believe that the said INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE cannot in fact make a valid offer of proof of its substantive existence other than as a private entity;

3. Fact: I, {Your Name Here}, have not seen or been presented with an offer of proof of verifiable evidence which demonstrates that the INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE is anything other than a wholly private entity presuming to act under color of law, while at all times, masquerading as a duly authorized government taxing agency for enforcement and collection purposes;

4. Fact: I, {Your Name Here}, have not seen or been presented with an offer of proof, that any verifiable evidence is available to demonstrate the INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE is exempted from complying with the letter of law re Title 15 chapter 41 subchapter V §1962;

« Last Edit: November 26, 2017, 12:59:59 pm by Luck »
Logged

Luck

  • FSP Participant
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2369
Defend against IRS Abuse via Title 15, not 26
« Reply #10 on: November 23, 2017, 01:39:18 pm »

Defend against IRS Abuse via Title 15, not 26 - Part 3 of 6
(from Freedom Documents at http://keystoliberty2.wordpress.com/ )

The IRS Title 15 Is Their Achilles Heel (Debt Validation) Part 3
Friday, 08 Mar 2013

UNDISPUTED CONCLUSIONS

TITLE 15 > CHAPTER 41 > SUBCHAPTER V > §1692 is an act of Congress designed to protect natural persons, 1692a. The term “consumer” means any natural person obligated or allegedly obligated to pay any debt, from abusive collection agency practices, see exhibit 1 of 9 pages;

THE INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE is incorporated in Delaware as a collection agency for a Puerto Rico company; INTERNAL REVENUE TAX AND AUDIT SERVICE (IRS) /// For Profit General Delaware Corporation /// Incorporation Date 7/12/33 /// File No. 0325720, see exhibit 2 of 3 pages;

THE INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE is not a part of the United States government, see: Diversified Metal Products v. T-Bow Co. Trust 158 F.R.D. 660/ IRS 93-405-E-EJL, see exhibit 3 of 3 pages;

Several Corporations involved with the INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE are also unlawfully acting under color of law as government agencies, see exhibit 4 of 1 page.

NOTICE

Notice for the agent is notice for the principal applies under this notice.

Notification of legal responsibility is “the first essential of due process of law.” Connally v. General Construction Co., 269 U.S. 385, 391 (1926).

Your silence stands as consent, and tacit approval, for the declarations of facts and conclusions here being established as fact, as a law matter and this affidavit absent timely rebuttal, will stand as final judgment in this matter.

Failure to reply within thirty days, establishes you are in agreement with the foregoing and are thus legally estopped pursuant to: Carmine v. Bowen, 64 A. 932, 1906; silence activates estoppel.

I, {Your Name Here}, hereby reserve the right to amend this document, and am the only party authorized to assert the right to make amendments to this document as necessary, and in order that the truth may be ascertained and these proceedings justly determined.

Should any party possess information that will controvert and overcome this Declaration with specificity, please advise Me in writing by DECLARATION in AFFIDAVIT FORM within 30 days from receipt hereof and thereby provide Me with your timely rebuttal, proving with particularity by stating all requisite actual evidentiary facts and all requisite actual law, and at no time in reliance on mere presumptive facts and personal conclusions of law, that this Affidavit by Verified Declaration is substantially and materially false sufficiently for changing materially my declaration.

The Undersigned, I, {Your Name Here}, do herewith declare, state and say that I, {Your Name Here}, issue this with sincere intent in truth, that I, the undersigned am competent by stating the matters set forth herein, that the contents are true, correct, complete, and certain, admissible as evidence, reasonable, not misleading, and by My best knowledge, by Me, the undersigned.

This document and all others pertaining to this issue may be recorded and thus may be used at the discretion of its issuer for any and all matters as so allowed under Rule 902 of the Federal Rules of Evidence and others, including, without limitations, the jurisdiction of the State of Arizona {or other state} and the United States of America.

By my hand, this sixth day of November, 2007, {Your Name Here}.

Signed: _____________________________________,

All Rights Reserved

{Your Name Here}
c/o {street, town}, Arizona {or other state} republic
near [{zip code}]


Arizona {or other state} state Republic )

) ss. JURAT

Maricopa {or other} County )

On the ___ day of ________, 200__, {Your Name Here} personally appeared before me and proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person whose name is subscribed hereto and acknowledged to me that he executed the same under asseveration, and accepts the facts thereof. Subscribed and affirmed before me this day. Witness my hand and seal this ____ day of __________, 200__.

Notary Signature

My Commission expires on the ____ day of ____________, 20____.


Affidavit is 2 pages Exhibit is 16 pages Document number 2

certified mail number 7007 0710 0003 8330 1234

Exhibits

INTERNAL REVENUE TAX AND AUDIT SERVICE (IRS)
For Profit General Delaware Corporation
Incorporation Date 7/12/33
File No. 0325720

FEDERAL RESERVE ASSOCIATION (Federal Reserve)
Non-profit Delaware Corporation
Incorporation Date 9/13/14
File No. 0042817

CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AUTHORITY INC. (CIA)
For Profit General Delaware Corporation
Incorporation Date 3/9/83
File No. 2004409

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, INC.
Non-profit Delaware Corporation
Incorporation Date 4/19/89
File No. 2193946

FEDERAL LAND ACQUISITION CORP.
For-profit General Delaware Corporation
Incorporation Date 8/22/80
File No. 0897960

RTC COMMERCIAL ASSETS TRUST 1995-NP3-2
For-profit Delaware Statutory Trust
Incorporation Date 10/24/95
File No. 2554768

SOCIAL SECURITY CORP, DEPT. OF HEALTH, EDUCATION AND WELFARE
For-Profit General Delaware Corporation
Incorporation Date: 11/13/89
File No. 2213135

XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
« Last Edit: November 26, 2017, 01:00:28 pm by Luck »
Logged

Luck

  • FSP Participant
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2369
Defend against IRS Abuse via Title 15, not 26
« Reply #11 on: November 23, 2017, 01:45:22 pm »

Defend against IRS Abuse via Title 15, not 26 - Part 4 of 6
(from Freedom Documents at http://keystoliberty2.wordpress.com/ )

A new concept that might be worth studying:

Following are 4 concepts that when studied together may be an important part of the puzzle that have been recently discovered.

1) Nihil dicit judgement: This court order is actually higher than a default judgement and leaves no room for an appeal.

2) There is no accusation in civil court, therefore the word charge is synonymous with the word bill in civil court.

3) The IRS is a debt collection service.

4) Debt collection is covered under Title 15 chapter 4 sub-chapter V section 1692, not Title 26.

Combining all of these facts into one concept creates a heretofore unused defense that appears to be valid.

When the IRS charges someone with willful failure to file under civil law they are really billing the victim. The victim then tries to fight using the Constitution and/or Title 26 without ever really requesting a verified assessment of the debt under Title 15,which gives the IRS the ability to be granted a nihil dicit judgement against the victim in UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, making the bill lawful. Once the bill is deemed lawful the IRS gets to claim the victim is fraudulently refusing to pay a legal debt and therefore converts the refusal to pay into some kind of criminal act.

In reality, since the IRS is nothing more than a debt collection service the victim can demand the IRS to verify the assessment, which the IIRS can’t, and if the IRS could, the victim can make the IRS take the action to the jurisdictional district the alleged debtor is in.

These are all recent discoveries and have been used minimally, yet separately. I am attempting to combine all 4 into one complete concept in a way the average man can use as a defense against the terrorist.

I am getting a lot of calls and e-mails on Title 15 so I will try to explain our concept again. Use this with the previous explanation and people interested should understand the concept with very little research.

The first rule of winning in court is to win before court. The second rule is to make the other party argue about something other than the case at hand. IRS attorneys know this, so should we.

Going to court and arguing about taxes using Title 26 is ineffective for the following reasons.

1) Title 26 is used by the government to determine the tax. see Title 26

2) The IRS is a debt collection service, not a government agency. see Diversified Metal v. T-Bow trust/IRS

3) The bill issued by the U.S. TREASURY (under Title 26) becomes a debt collected by the IRS (which has to follow Title 15).

4) If you fight the IRS under Title 26, you are fighting something they have nothing to do with. It is like contesting the electric bill to the mail man....

5) The bill has already been adjudicated under nihil dicit judgement and stands if not contested under Title 15. You can not contest the bill under Title 26 since that is the government code on how to figure the bill, not the bill itself.

6) Demanding the IRS verify the assessment (read as bill) requires them to cease and desist (under Title 15) until they supply the documents.

7) The IRS can not supply the requisite documents and therefore you have beat them before court. See rule 1

8 ) If you go to court you can argue the correct issue, the bill, not how they determined the bill, thus you can win by arguing the right argument. See rule 2

9) You can force the IRS to do the action in your judicial district, i.e. the court nearest the debtor, which they will not do, and therefore you won’t go to court. See YHWH’s scriptures.

a) See; TITLE 26 > Subtitle F > CHAPTER 76 > Subchapter A > §7408

§7408. Actions to enjoin specified conduct related to tax shelters and reportable transactions

(d) Citizens and residents outside the United States

If any citizen or resident of the United States does not reside in, and does not have his principal place of business in, any United States judicial district, such citizen or resident shall be treated for purposes of this section as residing in the District of Columbia.

I know this seems over simplified, but a cursory study of unsuccessful IRS litigation against their victims will lead one to determine that one of the common denominators of acquittals is that somewhere or somehow the victim did some type of assessment request that was never affirmed. This is diametrically opposed to all the victims that lost using Title 26 and the absence of applicability to the code.

In summary, just like a charge in a traffic ticket, don’t fight the law and their reasoning, deny the bill and require them to prove it exists as a matter of record, before they make it a matter of record under nihil dicit judgement because you didn’t deny it.
 
Example:

A contractOR (government under Title 26) issues you (contractEE) a bill through their third party collection service (IRS), you do not respond. Third party collector service, whose actions and remedies are defined in Title 15, goes to court ex-parte and receives a nihil dicit judgement. You get dragged into a foreign court (USDC) and attempt to fight the contractOR and their rules for issuing the bill under the Constitution and/or Title 26, neither of which applies, since it is the bill being discussed not the entity that issued the bill or how said entity determined the amount. Any attorney would tell you this is a waste of time. You (contractEE) must first void the bill under the appropriate code (Title 15) and demand the case be kept in the proper jurisdiction (nearest judicial district).

In essence, Title 26 applies to the government entity that determined the bill and Title 15 applies to the collection agency attacking you for payment. Its almost incomprehensible to believe that legally Title 26, THE INTERNAL REVENUE CODE has little to do with the INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE. This appears to be a well orchestrated word trick.

XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

Here is the silver bullet, check it out.

Title 26 has nothing to do with the INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE; it only applies to THE INTERNAL REVENUE.

The give away is in Title 26 section 7802 (b)(1)(c)

7802 INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE OVERSIGHT BOARD
(b)(1)(c) one member shall be the Commissioner of the Internal Revenue.

Hence, The Internal Revue Code not The Internal Revenue Service Code.

The Internal Revenue and the Internal Revenue Service are two separate and distinct entities.

The Internal Revenue is a government agency and is under the scope of Title 26.

Internal Revenue Service is a private for Profit Corporation and is under the scope of Title 15.

If you look up Internal Revenue Service in the Index of Title 26 you will discover it is only mentioned in a few sections. None of which have anything to do with determining the tax, they only deal with governance, collection and the like.

XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
« Last Edit: November 26, 2017, 01:00:54 pm by Luck »
Logged

Luck

  • FSP Participant
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2369
Defend against IRS Abuse via Title 15, not 26
« Reply #12 on: November 23, 2017, 01:48:11 pm »

Defend against IRS Abuse via Title 15, not 26 - Part 5 of 6
(from Freedom Documents at http://keystoliberty2.wordpress.com/ )

The following contains a complete reference from Title 26 detailing the distinctions between INTERNAL REVENUE and INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE. INTERNAL REVENUE deals with taxes on liquor, tobacco and firearms. INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE deals with the collection of assessed taxes for the TREASURY and the INTERNAL REVENUE.

This concludes my cursory study of the distinctions. After reading the following listed sections I believe you all will agree with my conclusion that Title 26 does not apply to controversies dealing with the ability of the INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE to collect taxes.

6404
7214-7217
7516-7517
7521
7608
7622
7624
7802-7808
7802 especially (b)(1)(c)
7803 especially (1)(A)
7806 especially (b)

Nowhere in Title 26 is it stated that the INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE has anything to do with assessing taxes, that is done by either the TREASURY or INTERNAL REVENUE. The distinctions between the two are far too numerous to accept as a scribners error. The intent becomes obvious while reading the aforementioned sections.

XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

After all the studying I have done on this recent discovery about the THE INTERNAL REVENUE V. THE INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, something just dawned on me that seems to be missing from Title 26. So here I am at 3 am going through the book from cover to cover and it is nowhere to be found. I get a lot of letters and docs from various agents of the IRS and their assorted cohorts and it is always there, but it is not on any of my copies of Title 26.

I have always hated seeing that satanic looking symbol and it usually makes me cringe more than the stupid wording underneath it. Its their logo, some kind of Nazi looking dead eagle. Its everywhere on INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE crap, but it is nowhere to be found in or on the Title 26 book.

Understanding the laws concerning copyrights and trademarks makes me consider this as prima facie evidence my theory is correct. If Title 26 was part of THE INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE that logo would be all over the place. The reason it is not is because that would invalidate the logo since it would be used to commit an act of fraud.

This may not seem like a big deal but it would be like McDonalds not putting its GOLDEN ARCHES on its packaging.

Study points:
court
nihil dicit judgement

Title 26
IRS logo not on Title 26 book
section 7802 (b)(1)(c)
IRS incorporated in 1933 long after INTERNAL REVENUE already operating
Diversified Metal v. T-Bow Trust / IRS
IR assesses and IRS collects

Title 15 Chapter 41 Sub V section 1692
verified assessment
judicial district

XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

{CFR has} 50 Titles and not one is about private corporations

· Title 1 General Provisions
· Title 2 The Congress
· Title 3 The President
· Title 4 Flag and Seal, Seat Of Government,and the States
· Title 5 Government Organization and Employees
· Appendix to Title 5
· Title 6 Domestic Security
· Title 7 Agriculture
· Title 8 Aliens and Nationality
· Title 9 Arbitration Title 10 Armed Forces
· Appendix to Title 10 (Rules of Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces)
· Title 11 Bankruptcy
· Appendix to Title 11
· Title 12 Banks and Banking
· Title 13 Census
· Title 14 Coast Guard
· Title 15 Commerce and Trade
· Title 16 Conservation
· Title 17 Copyrights
· Title 18 Crimes and Criminal Procedure
· Appendix to Title 18
· Title 19 Customs Duties
· Title 20 Education
· Title 21 Food and Drugs
· Title 22 Foreign Relations and Intercourse
· Title 23 Highways
· Title 24 Hospitals and Asylums
· Title 25 Indians
· Title 26 Internal Revenue Code
· Appendix to Title 26
· Title 27 Intoxicating Liquors
· Title 28 Judiciary and Judicial Procedure
· Appendix to Title 28
· Title 29 Labor
· Title 30 Mineral Lands and Mining
· Title 31 Money and Finance
· Title 32 National Guard
· Title 33 Navigation and Navigable Waters
· Title 34 Navy (repealed)
· Title 35 Patents
· Title 36 Patriotic Societies and Observances
· Title 37 Pay and Allowances Of the Uniformed Services
· Title 38 Veterans’ Benefits
· Appendix to Title 38 (Rules of Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims()
· Title 39 Postal Service
· Title 40 Public Buildings, Property, and Works
· Title 41 Public Contracts
· Title 42 The Public Health and Welfare
· Title 43 Public Lands
· Title 44 Public Printing and Documents
· Title 45 Railroads
· Title 46 Shipping
· Appendix to Title 46
· Title 47 Telegraphs, Telephones, and Radiotelegraphs
· Title 48 Territories and Insular Possessions
· Title 49 Transportation
· Title 50 War and National Defense

XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

How it works.

THE INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE gives you their docs that you fill out, or they fill out. They then give the docs to THE INTERNAL REVENUE which says, “oh look this guy owes us this money”. THE INTERNAL REVENUE then gets a nihil dicit judgement making the debt valid and turns the bill over to the INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, a private for profit collection agency, for collection. You then fight THE INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE on the validity, which was already covertly adjudicated, under Title 26. The judge considers you insane since he knows Title 26 has nothing to do with THE INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE and ONLY concerns itself with THE INTERNAL REVENUE. Which would be like taking something you bought at WALMART back to KMART.

This is also exactly what ALL other debt collection companies due for their vendors.

XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

« Last Edit: November 26, 2017, 01:01:25 pm by Luck »
Logged

Luck

  • FSP Participant
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2369
Defend against IRS Abuse via Title 15, not 26
« Reply #13 on: November 23, 2017, 01:50:39 pm »

Defend against IRS Abuse via Title 15, not 26 - Part 6 of 6
(from Freedom Documents at http://keystoliberty2.wordpress.com/ )

Lectlaw: JUDGMENT BY NIL DICIT, is one rendered against a defendant for want of a plea. The plaintiff obtains a rule on the defendant to plead within a time specified, of which he serves a notice on the defendant or his attorney; if the defendant neglect to enter a plea within the time specified, the plaintiff may sign judgment against him.

law-dictionary.org: NIHIL DICIT. He says nothing. It is the failing of the defendant to put in a plea or answer to the plaintiff’s declaration by the day assigned; and in plea or answer to the plaintiff’s declaration by the day assigned; and in this case judgment is given against the defendant of course, as he says this case judgment is given against the defendant of course, as he says nothing why it should not. Vide 15 Vin. Ab. 556; Dane’s Ab. Index, h.t. nothing why it should not. Vide 15 Vin. Ab. 556; Dane’s Ab. Index, h.t.

Research.lawyers.com Nihil-dicit judgement: a judgment entered against a defendant who has failed to make an effective answer (as because the answer is withdrawn or does not respond to the merits of the plaintiff’s case)

Black’s Law Dictionary, Sixth Edition, page 1045 Nihil Dicit. He says nothing. The name of the judgment which may be taken as of course against a defendant who omits to plead or answer the plaintiff’s declaration or complaint within the time limited. In some jurisdictions it is otherwise known as judgment “for want of a plea”.

Judgment taken against party who withdraws his answer is judgment nihil dicit, which amounts to confession of cause of action stated, and carries with it, more strongly than judgment by default, admission of justice of plaintiff’s case. See also Nil dicit judgment

XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

Just for information:

November 5, 2007 was the day that some guy, through a serious of rather bizarre discoveries and epiphanies made a great discovery, really YHWH slapped some sense into this guy. That discovery being nothing more than a simple word game; THE INTERNAL REVENUE and THE INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE are two distinct and separate entities.

When all the lawyers decide to quit defending their education and their own opinions and open their eyes to the simple fact that Title 26 has nothing at all to do with THE INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE and from its very beginning the confusion was purposeful and done with malice aforethought.

I have received so many reports from all other the country from people who now know why the IRS is leaving them alone. These people, some by accident and some on purpose required the IRS to verify the assessment, some with and some without mentioning Title 15. Regardless, once these people demanded the verification the IRS went away.

My advice to everyone is to treat the IRS like it is what it is, a private debt collector. None of us would use Title 26 to argue against a credit card company’s collector service and in all reality that is all the IRS is. Their incorporation documents confirm this.

Don’t forget, there is no accusation in civil court, charge in civil law means bill, nothing else. Treat a bill as a bill.

XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

This might clear things up, but if you have no background in law it might be more confusing. Read it until you understand it. When you do understand it you will be able to follow their road map to destruction, or get off the path. It might help to go down and read the summary first if you have no background in law.

THE INTERNAL REVENUE (IR) deals with the THE INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE (IRS) under Administrative law (E). This allows the 2 separate entities to communicate privately and off the record. They can also do financial dealings without reporting to the court or the other parties. It also keeps those pesky human and Constitutional rights out of the case since Administrative law (E) is under the executive branch and not the legislative branch.

The IRS deals with a person’s strawman under Administrative law (E). We want them to deal with us under Private law (B), which will cause them to name and hold accountable the actual human being that is attacking you, but they created the strawman so they would not have to. As long as you use Title 26 which is under Administrative law (E) you are treated as a corporation (corporation don’t have human or Constitutional rights). When you invoke Title 15, which deals with natural persons (which do have human and Constitutional rights) the IRS loses authority because they will now be treated by the court as what they are, a private for Profit Corporation. Under Private law you can deal directly with the human, and his real name, that is attacking you rather than the whole corporation. By dealing with the IRS under Administrative law (E), you can not invoke the natural person concept since it is not included in its definitions. Also, since Administrative law (E) is part of Public law (A), any conviction can be moved to another section of Public law (A) called Criminal law (F). But, when dealing with the IRS under Title 15 you are considered a natural person and can invoke Constitutional law (D) if they try to violate your rights. Remember, the IRS agents use pseudonyms to keep us from going into Private law (B). A good rule to follow is if the IRS is trying to stop it, you should try and start it. Private law (B) can not be moved to Criminal law (F) since they are under different legal concepts.

 Summary This is very, very important: If you invoke Title 26 you stay under Administrative law (E) and you can not use Constitutional and/or human rights as your defense since they do not exist in Administrative law (E), which is for corporations. The RS has the authority under Administrative law (E) to move the proceedings to Criminal law (F) since both laws are relegated under Public law (A). If you invoke Title 15 you have moved over to private law (B) and are to be considered a natural person, human being, and have Constitutional rights. Plus the IRS can not move a case form Private law which is its own entity to Criminal law (F) since that is under Public law (A).

Definitions of laws:

In general terms, public law involves interrelations between the state and the general population, whereas private law involves interactions between private citizens. Generally speaking, private law is the area of law in a society that affects the relationships between individuals or groups without the intervention of the state or government. In many cases the public/private law distinction is confounded by laws that regulate private relations while having been passed by legislative enactment. In some cases these public statutes are known as laws of public order, as private individuals do not have the right to break them and any attempt to circumvent such laws is void as against public policy.

A) Public law is the law governing the relationship between individuals (citizens, companies) and the state. Constitutional law, administrative law and criminal law are sub-divisions of public law.

B) Private law is that part of a legal system which is part of the jus commune that involves relationships between individuals, such as the law of contracts or torts, as it is called in the common law, and the law of obligations as it is called in civilian legal systems. It is to be distinguished from public law, which deals with relationships between natural and artificial persons (i.e., individuals, business entities, non-profit organizations) and the state including regulatory statutes, penal law and other law that effects the public order.

C) Corporate law refers to the law establishing separate legal entities known as the company or corporation and governs the most prevalent legal models for firms, for instance limited companies Technically, a company is a juristic person which has a separate legal identity from its shareholding members, and is ordinarily incorporated to undertake commercial business.

D) Constitutional law deals with the relationship between the state and individual, and the relationships between different branches of the state, such as the executive, the legislative and the judiciary.

E) Administrative law refers to the body of law which regulates bureaucratic managerial procedures and is administered by the executive branch of a government and to the body of law that defines the powers of administrative agencies; rather than the judicial or legislative branches (if they are different in that particular jurisdiction). This body of law regulates international trade, manufacturing, pollution, taxation, and the like. Also called regulatory law, it is the body of law that arises from the activities of administrative agencies of government. Government agency action can include rulemaking, adjudication, or the enforcement of a specific regulatory agenda. Administrative law is considered a branch of public law. Administrative law expanded greatly during the twentieth century.

F) Criminal law involves the state imposing sanctions for crimes committed by individuals so that society can achieve justice and a peaceable social order. This differs from Civil law in that civil actions are disputes between two parties that are not of significant public concern.
« Last Edit: November 26, 2017, 01:01:52 pm by Luck »
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up