Free State Project Forum
264408 Posts in 21115 Topics by 34806 Members / Latest Member: CarlotaMo
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 18, 2013, 12:26:20 pm

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search

Join the FSP

POSTING GUIDELINES and ADVICE FOR NEW MEMBERS

NOTICE: The forum will be down for maintenance beginning at 7PM (NH time) this evening. It should be up again by 9PM. Please forgive the inconvenience and feel free to e-mail arick@freestateproject.org if you have any questions or support requests.

+  Free State Project Forum
|-+  FSP -- Recruiting and Publicity
| |-+  FSP Recruiting (Moderators: Steve, 1DayAtATime)
| | |-+  Rand Paul and Ron Paul moving to New Hampshire
« previous next »
Pages: [1]  Go Down Print
Author Topic: Rand Paul and Ron Paul moving to New Hampshire  (Read 2915 times)
James65
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 8




Ignore
Rand Paul and Ron Paul moving to New Hampshire
« on: June 07, 2012, 10:57:08 pm »

Is there any way we could get these men to move to New Hampshire?  Naturally I want to see Rand Paul retain his senate seat.  But if they both moved and through their influence behind the FSP, we could have a free state.  The FSP may not share their pro-life or anti-gay marriage views.

Has anyone contacted Justin Amash?  He is a libertarian-leaning Republican from MI.  He is very young and has a long career ahead of him.

On the topic of Ron Paul, you can't go wrong with this link: http://pinups4ronpaul.com/
Logged
Bazil
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 816

not the spice and not the country




Ignore
Re: Rand Paul and Ron Paul moving to New Hampshire
« Reply #1 on: June 08, 2012, 12:45:47 pm »

Would be nice if we could, but I'm not sure if they'd be elected if they moved to this area since they would be new comers to the region.  No way they'd want to risk that.  I think a better bet would be to get behind local liberty leaning candidates.
Logged

"If it ain't broke, fix it till it is!"- The government | "Politicians are like diapers, they need to be changed often, and for the same reasons!" -  a friend
anon37268573
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 517

First1000




Ignore
Re: Rand Paul and Ron Paul moving to New Hampshire
« Reply #2 on: June 08, 2012, 01:22:46 pm »

IIRC, Ron Paul said he would consider moving after he retired at one point.

Maybe, we could crowd-fund a job for him at NHLA, or something. There's nothing that motivates people like money. If we could put together $150K-250K for a one year position that would probably do it. $250K would be less that $250 per NH Freestater. I would give $250 for all the press and momentum getting Ron Paul to move would bring.

Our numbers are getting large enough now that we can put significant amounts to money together for in state political efforts.
Logged
Ficking Chucken
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 6




Ignore
Re: Rand Paul and Ron Paul moving to New Hampshire
« Reply #3 on: June 08, 2012, 04:59:18 pm »

The more I see and hear from Rand Paul the more I am convinced that he is not anything like a Libertarian.  He seems to cast his lot with his Repub buddies unquestionably and in complete lockstep, doesn't seem to have a whole lot to say except the usual Repub mantras. Even voted for the NDAA.  Now, he would rather support Romney, a total Xtian fascist, than give any credence whatsoever to the Libertarian movement.  And while I am fan of free trade, I am not in favor of RepublicanTeabagger ideas of diminished(if not all together extinguished worker rights in order for the corporatocracy to earn a few more pennies.) As a Libertarian I am NOT a big fan of "organized labor".  But somebody MUST be fighting for the Highest wage, I am powerless all by myself.  Libertarians need to be just as fearfull of "Big Business" as they are of big government. In both cases, the system always devolves into totalitarianism and slavery.  Even Jefferson recognized the dangers of corporatism and struggled for the idea of creating mechanisms for 'limiting' wealth. The free market, while an idea that I admire and expound, does little to control the "actions" of the wealthy once they gain vast amounts influence and power. Take a look at the sheer number of "profit" prisons, the growth of the 'probation' and 'watchdog' agencies (urine and blood testing), etc.  All of these are free market solutions to the problem of how to enslave the population and also make them believe it was their fault. Fuck Rand Paul. He's a fucking poser. Please think before you post pro Rand Paul propaganda. I have yet to see or hear anything from him but the usual Republican nonsense.

Gary Johnson 2012
Libertarian Candidate for President of the United States.
Logged
JasonPSorens
Administrator
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 5037


Neohantonum liberissimum erit.


WWW
Re: Rand Paul and Ron Paul moving to New Hampshire
« Reply #4 on: June 08, 2012, 07:01:07 pm »

Rand Paul doesn't deserve any of your abuse. He led the charge on killing an amendment that would have made the indefinite detention provision worse:
http://politics.gather.com/viewArticle.action?articleId=281474980854126
It would otherwise have passed by a voice vote. And he didn't vote for the NDAA with the indefinite detention provision; he voted against it. We also have Rand Paul to thank for inserting an amendment into the Iran sanctions bill explicitly stating that it does not authorize the use of force against Iran:
http://www.politico.com/blogs/on-congress/2012/03/rand-paul-blocks-iran-sanctions-bill-118887.html
He's led congressional opposition to the TSA: http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0512/75896.html

The man is a one-man wrecking machine in the halls of power, and he deserves support from real libertarians.
Logged

Audio signature (MP3)
"Experience has shown that it is difficult, if not impossible, for a populous state to be run by good laws." --Aristotle, The Politics
TJames
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 466


Just so you know, I'm available and seeking guys.




Ignore
Re: Rand Paul and Ron Paul moving to New Hampshire
« Reply #5 on: June 17, 2012, 03:10:17 pm »

Ron Paul is much more philosophically a voluntarist than is obviously seen. He has the answer when it comes to gay marriage. NO MORE FUCKING MARRIAGE LICENSES!!!! He also recognizes that abortion is too complex for government to handle. You may THINK he is a conservative on that issue, but he is using a non-aggression argument, not a religious one. The FSP has stated that it dose not take a position on abortion, it takes hardly any positions. It's my understanding that libertarians are evenly split on abortion and I'd expect voluntarist to have the same split.

Gary Johnson is not a libertarian, at least not in the classical liberal/voluntarist sense. How about legalize and don't tax? I'd vote for him just to hold us over till Kokesh can run if he could win, but I'll just vote for him symbolically.

Big Business is a byproduct of big government. Only the government is immortal in the world they are in. Without government they would serve us or be devoured by us and the others.
Logged
1DayAtATime
First 1000
Global Moderator
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 5915


Be Yourself


WWW
Re: Rand Paul and Ron Paul moving to New Hampshire
« Reply #6 on: June 17, 2012, 03:57:25 pm »

Ron Paul mentioned maybe thinking about moving in the future in 2007, I believe.  Here are a couple Ron Paul quotes and even a video.

Quote
If this exploratory committee doesn't go well, maybe I ought to consider moving here [New Hampshire] and running (in) a statewide race.
Ron Paul in 2007

Quote
I'm a friend of the Free State Project. Absolutely! Check it out, find out, and if you like it, join, and continue the effort!
Ron Paul in 2007

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CI9ZjjEtH4g

Logged

Please do not take anything I say as 100% accurate or as an official opinion of the FSP.

Haven't joined the Free State Project yet? Join now! http://freestateproject.org/fsn10
Looking for info on where to live in NH? http://freestateproject.org/nhinfo/Housing.php
Looking for info on finding a job in NH? http://freestateproject.org/jobs
John Edward Mercier
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 6052

Native




Ignore
Re: Rand Paul and Ron Paul moving to New Hampshire
« Reply #7 on: June 18, 2012, 11:58:02 am »

Ron Paul is much more philosophically a voluntarist than is obviously seen. He has the answer when it comes to gay marriage. NO MORE FUCKING MARRIAGE LICENSES!!!! He also recognizes that abortion is too complex for government to handle. You may THINK he is a conservative on that issue, but he is using a non-aggression argument, not a religious one. The FSP has stated that it dose not take a position on abortion, it takes hardly any positions. It's my understanding that libertarians are evenly split on abortion and I'd expect voluntarist to have the same split.

Gary Johnson is not a libertarian, at least not in the classical liberal/voluntarist sense. How about legalize and don't tax? I'd vote for him just to hold us over till Kokesh can run if he could win, but I'll just vote for him symbolically.

Big Business is a byproduct of big government. Only the government is immortal in the world they are in. Without government they would serve us or be devoured by us and the others.
He's on the record as supporting DOMA. And he's on the record for a federal constitutional amendment to define life to begin at conception, rather than birth... how is that not a religious position? What is 'voluntary' about having to 'obey' someone else's desires?
Logged
TJames
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 466


Just so you know, I'm available and seeking guys.




Ignore
Re: Rand Paul and Ron Paul moving to New Hampshire
« Reply #8 on: June 21, 2012, 12:34:21 am »

He's on the record as supporting DOMA. And he's on the record for a federal constitutional amendment to define life to begin at conception, rather than birth... how is that not a religious position? What is 'voluntary' about having to 'obey' someone else's desires?
[/quote]

Ron Paul dosn't want marriage moving into the government any more than it is. We should be trying to work at getting states out of defining marriage and Ron Paul is the only one in Washington to even suggest that. Married people get a lot of benefits in tax and immigration but he wants those benefits to be more available anyway, so why have it be a federal issue for Santorum? Dose the federal government make any state recognize any out-of-state marriage? I don't think they should, but I hate that it is a state issue.

Ron Paul is a scientist. What do scientist consider life? Once we get passed the science we can debate whether or not the zygote has individual rights. I have found religious people who think he is too soft on this issue. He is not Santorum who takes this with a religious reasoning. "Murder is wrong because the Bible says" He is more like what you find if you web search "antiabortion atheist". The religious-right may favor the baby because it is sinless or because it is unbaptized depending on doctrine, and I a prolife voluntarist would favor the mother in life or death situations. Killing a third trimester baby just because you changed your mind is a meaningless wast of life. If it is done because rape than why don't we apply that argument to children? Now if you mention emotional trauma than you have an argument because I'm not there.
Logged
Pages: [1]  Go Up Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.18 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!