Back in 2006, a resident of New Hampshire's
second largest city was arrested while at the police station attempting to file a complaint against officers. His crime? He had video tape evidence of the officers' wrongdoings. According to the police, that's wiretapping. After
world wide attention, the police dropped the charges. His complaint was found to be valid, but the evidence never saw the light of day.
Well, guess what? Round two.
There are differing reports, but
again the police arrested Mr. Gannon and again, they seized his video camera. This time it's "falsifying evidence" because he tried to hand off the camera, most likely to protect its contents. If there's the potential of police wrongdoing, how is it that the law permits the police to seize the evidence?