Free State Project Forum
271246 Posts in 22221 Topics by 36633 Members / Latest Member: Thomas123
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
October 30, 2014, 11:39:01 am

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search

Join the FSP

POSTING GUIDELINES and ADVICE FOR NEW MEMBERS

NOTICE: The forum will be down for maintenance beginning at 7PM (NH time) this evening. It should be up again by 9PM. Please forgive the inconvenience and feel free to e-mail arick@freestateproject.org if you have any questions or support requests.

+  Free State Project Forum
|-+  New Hampshire -- The "Live Free or Die" State
| |-+  NH Publicity
| | |-+  pro-FSP editorial in Goffstown News
« previous next »
Pages: [1]  Go Down Print
Author Topic: pro-FSP editorial in Goffstown News  (Read 5625 times)
Friday
First 1000
FSP Participant
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 463

I'm a browncoat!


WWW

Ignore
pro-FSP editorial in Goffstown News
« on: October 29, 2010, 04:03:11 am »

"Two Free State Project activists were arrested in Weare some months ago for video recording a police traffic stop at the middle school and a police officer in the lobby of the police station. Wiretapping charges were later dropped, but the activists are still fighting to have their cameras returned.

But the question remains, why were they charged with wiretapping in the first place?

According to state law RSA 570-A it is illegal to record someone without their knowledge – on business or commercial property. Both instances of recording, however, took place on public property – first a public middle school, then the police station.

Video recording something on public property is no different than the media taking pictures on public property without consent, which is perfectly legal.

According to RSA 570-A:4, any device used in violation of this wiretapping law may be seized. But if the charges were dropped, why are the cameras still in police custody? These cameras need to be returned to their rightful owners.

Police Chief Gregory Begin said the cameras are being withheld due to a possible indictment from the Attorney General’s Office. Given that Begin’s department has dropped the wiretapping charges, we think it’s unlikely the AG will prosecute this matter further.

This entire incident seems like nothing more than a case of bullying by Weare police. Police are public servants here to protect the public, not to act like a bunch of boorish stormtroopers.

- Editorials published by Neighborhood News Inc. are written by an editorial board."
http://goffstownnews.com/goffstown-news/2010/10/21-opinion.html
Logged

Free your mind, and your ass will follow. -- Parliament/Funkadelic
BikerBill
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 33



WWW

Ignore
Re: pro-FSP editorial in Goffstown News
« Reply #1 on: October 30, 2010, 09:20:39 am »

Logged
Pages: [1]  Go Up Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.18 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!