Free State Project Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6   Go Down

Author Topic: DIY Law & Community Rights Movement  (Read 26959 times)

Luck

  • FSP Participant
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2174
Re: Court Action against Corruption [Update: Your #1 Right!]
« Reply #45 on: December 31, 2012, 05:38:44 pm »

Remove the Blindfold!!! Your #1 Right!
- We all talk about our "rights". Many complain how our "rights" are being taken away. A few are ready to fight-and-die to protect our "rights". But few know what is their #1 Right!
- In fact, the main reason we're losing so many of our rights these days is precisely because so few know their #1 Right! That's right! (No pun intended.) Ask yourself this, "What good are "rights" that can't be enforced?"
- Your #1 Right is the right to know how to enforce your rights! Yet, government isn't telling you! Your tax-supported schools aren't teaching your children. Lawyers certainly aren't leaking their money-making secrets to the public.
- An old adage says, "Ignorance of the law is no excuse," yet neither government nor the legal profession has at any time in the history of the world made any genuine effort to teach the public how justice is secured in courts. Nothing about the rules of evidence. Nothing about the rules of procedure. Nothing about how to use the rules to get Justice! Nothing!
- Without your #1 Right (or tens of thousands of dollars to pay lawyers to secure your rights for you) what good are government's empty promises? Indeed, if you don't know how to enforce your rights, do you really have any? Do you really? Think carefully! Rights without knowledge to enforce them are just empty promises, like carrots on a stick to get us to work hard and keep the economy going for the well-to-do who can afford lawyers to fight for them!
- You and your children have been lied to long enough! The legal profession cannot hide your #1 Right any longer! Your blindfold is coming off! Your #1 Right is easy-to-learn! Your #1 Right is the right to know how to enforce your rights! It's easy to learn how to enforce your rights in court ... without a lawyer!
- You can learn in a single weekend what it takes to obtain court orders that command sheriffs and federal marshals to protect and enforce your rights! Read Luke 11:52 in your Bible to discover how long the wool has been pulled over the public's eyes by lawyers who've been running the world far too long by purposely keeping you in the dark so lawyers can get rich at your expense!
- Exercise your #1 Right! In just 24 hours you can learn how to use the power of courts to get justice for yourselves and those you love, for your neighbors, for the world! The affordable Jurisdictionary step-by-step self-help course will give you the powerful keys of lawsuit knowledge lawyers have hidden from you for thousands of years. www.Jurisdictionary.com
COMMENTS:
... I have never seen/read anything like this. I am eager to get this information out to help others like me. Thank you. ... Sylvia C. ... Kula, Hawaii
Logged

Luck

  • FSP Participant
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2174
Re: Court Action against Corruption [Update: Control Judges in Court]
« Reply #46 on: January 02, 2013, 11:50:59 am »

You CAN Control Judges!

You dare not hope to win until you learn what this Tips & Tactics newsletter teaches about controlling trial level judges.

You must learn how to force the judge to see that the appellate courts that can reverse his decisions will reverse his decisions on appeal if he doesn't rule in your favor. Otherwise, the judge will rule as he pleases, confident you don't know how to get his decisions reversed on appeal.

Unless you follow the step-by-step Jurisdictionary method and force the judge to see he will be reversed on appeal if he doesn't rule in your favor, justice will be whatever the judge wants it to be. Your objective is always to: force the judge to see that the appellate courts that can reverse his decisions will reverse his decisions on appeal if he doesn't rule in your favor.

Losers miss this point ... and lose! Trial judges are not legal authority! Appellate courts are! The U.S. Constitution is not controlling law. What appellate courts say the U.S. Constitution means is controlling law. Statutes are not controlling law. What appellate courts say statutes mean is controlling law. Only controlling law controls judges.

Appellate court opinions are the legal authority that controls trial level judges! You may disagree with this. Many do and lose needlessly. I want you to win, but truth is unaffected by what you believe. Only truth is true. Nothing else is. Appellate court opinons are controlling law in this nation and every nation that follows our English system of justice.

Trial judges fear being reversed on appeal. That's what keeps them straight. That's why it's essential to learn how to force the judge in your case to see that the appellate courts that can reverse his decisions will reverse his decisions on appeal if he doesn't rule in your favor. No trial judge wants an appellate court to publish an official written opinion telling the world he was wrong!

Knowing how to control judges is the secret to winning and is explained step-by-step in my popular 24-hour self-help Jurisdictionary course. What you believe is controlling law means nothing. Don't believe me? Ok. Tell a judge your personal opinions about the law and how he should apply it and rule in your favor. See how far it gets you!

The only opinions that count in court are the published opinions of appellate court justices who stand in judgment of trial level judges and have power to reverse lower court decisions. This nation (and all others that follow our English justice system) is run by lawyers who sit as justices on appellate courts! The buck stops in court, not at the Whitehouse, Congress, or state legislature. If you believe otherwise, you are mistaken.

Your legal opinions (no matter how clever or persuasive and no matter how many tens of thousands agree with you in emails or on the internet) count for nothing in court. Controlling judges is what wins lawsuits, and judges are controlled only by appellate court opinions!
Logged

Luck

  • FSP Participant
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2174
Re: Sue for Corruption [NEW: Use Courts to Stop Major Corruption]
« Reply #47 on: January 03, 2013, 02:10:31 pm »

Use Courts to Stop Major Corruption

Sure, we have problems. BIG PROBLEMS. It's impossible not to see how our American Way of Life is threatened with New Speak, New Thought, and the threat of a New World Order. Traditional American values of self-reliance, hard work, honesty in business, and genuine patriotism that works to promote liberty by working for justice are still the only protection we have for ourselves and our children. Individual rights will continue to disappear ... if we do nothing. That is, ONLY IF WE DO NOTHING.

You don't need more paranoid warnings or insane legal theories that don't work! You need to learn how to FIX what's wrong. You need to learn how to FORCE your leaders to do what's right. You need to learn how to RESTORE the American Dream for yourself, your children, and future generations. There is hope for those willing to FIGHT SMART!

Complaining about a fox in the henhouse doesn't do a thing for the poor defenseless chickens. Yet, day-after-day I receive dozens of emails from well-meaning people who think pointing their fingers at the problems and urging their friends to recognize the problems will somehow magically make the problems go away. My in-box is flooded every day (and more of late) by folks I call pseudo patriots who insist the end is near. They may be well-meaning, and the points they make are often valid, but they aren't offering any practical solutions!

If you want the foxes out of the henhouse, and voting at the polls now-and-then doesn't seem to be having much effect, then it's time to start putting ink on paper! Ooops! Did you expect me to suggest violence? Not a chance. That's not what America is all about. We are a people (or, at least, we once were) dedicated to order, due process, and a peaceful resolution to our difficulties. That means ink on paper!

Complaining gets us nowhere, unless we complain with a "Complaint" filed at the local courthouse - 'cause that does wonders when it's done properly. If you don't believe me, look at the world around you and see for yourself how much of what we have today (good and bad) resulted from the decisions of courts. The pseudo patriots have only bad news and wacky ideas about how to fix our problems ... ideas that are putting quite a few people behind bars, I might add.

I have good news! We live in an age of opportunity such as the world has never seen before. When I entered the practice of law nearly a quarter-century ago, we didn't have computers to do on-line legal research. If we had a legal problem, there was only one solution: hire a lawyer. And, if you are like I was 30 years ago, you don't have tens of thousands of dollars to pay some lawyer who may end up dropping the ball or screwing your life up because of his or her stupid incompetence, laziness, or fear of the judge. Back then, it was either pay through the nose ... or lose! That was before Jurisdictionary.

Our very way of life is on trial. If "We the People" do not learn how to put ink on paper and take advantage of the power of our courts, we may soon be looking back at the "good old days" and wishing we'd done what we could while there was time to do it right.

Meanwhile, instead of encouraging you to learn the rules of court and how to use them to Restore the Republic the "right way" (abiding by the principles of our democratic republic) the pseudo patriots are leading many of you down a path to certain destruction. They are so busy finding fault while teaching their idiotic ideas about how greedy people can escape justice by claiming nonsense defenses, that good people like you are confused about where to turn for the "right way" to get justice.

We are a nation of laws! True patriots work with wisdom to control corrupt judges and legislators to change bad laws, instead of trying to find novel ways to get around the law for their own advantage. True patriots seek justice according to the rules!

Today's pseudo patriots have lost their way. Don't let them turn you from the "right way" with their proclamations of doom or confuse you into trying to win in court by saying you are not WHO YOU ARE if your name is in all capital letters, or any of the similar nonsense they sell.

We can turn this nation around if we work together! We can force judges to follow the rules. We can turn crooked lawyers out-on-their-ear! We can overcome even the most powerful opponent the "right way", peaceably, according to law and order - instead of being "outlaws" trying to wiggle out of our troubles with stupid tricks. The pseudo patriots are so obsessed with the admittedly serious problems we face at this hour they do not see that the solution is already in our own hands: The Law!

If it weren't so easy to learn the official rules there'd be no hope for us. But, it IS EASY to learn the rules and how to use them to force people in powerful positions to do what's right! We can put the law to work the "right way", using the "official rules" that overcome corrupt judges and defeat crooked lawyers and make justice possible for anyone of average intelligence willing to make an effort to learn how the legal game is played to win!

We must all stop staring at the darkness and lift the lamp of liberty and justice while there is yet time! Pseudo patriots find fault with America and her system of law and order, but that's all they do. The only answer pseudo patriots offer is to "spread the word", as if telling everyone what's wrong will magically make things right once again! It is madness! They say they are "patriots", but they don't tell you how to save your nation. They're too busy telling you what's wrong, who's at fault, and how ugly things will be when their terrible predictions come true. Their message is all negative! And, when they do offer their theories about what it takes to get justice, their theories are nothing short of lunacy!
    Fringe on the courtroom flag
    Name in all caps isn't them
    Copyrighting their own name
    Even disavowing their citizenship!
The list is nearly endless ... and totally insane!

The power to control corrupt government officials, crooked banks, and anyone else who violates the law contrary to our American Principles IS IN THE COURTS! This is YOUR POWER! Learn how to use it! Order my "How to Win in Court" self-help for non-lawyers ... step-by-step!

Comments:
Jurisdictionary has given me a greater appreciation of due process. It's amazing! ... Deron B. ... Salt Lake City, Utah
Logged

Luck

  • FSP Participant
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2174
Re: Sue Corruption [NEW: Make Court Case Easier]
« Reply #48 on: January 10, 2013, 06:03:25 pm »

Use Judicial Notice Motions!

Why bother struggling to prove obvious facts? Every court (state or federal) provides a method for getting around the necessity of proving obvious facts. This method is called "Judicial Notice". The process is covered completely in my affordable step-by-step 24-hour Jurisdictionary self-help course, but I'll tell you a little bit in this Tips & Tactics! The process is simple. You should always use it when you can!

You can make opponents' legal bullets bounce off your chest once the court takes judicial notice of an obvious fact, because the court's order settles the issue ... PERIOD! Obvious facts don't have to be "proven", if you can get the court to enter an order taking judicial notice of them.

You can move the court to enter an order taking judicial notice in writing or you can move the court by voice in the courtrooom. Vocal motions are called ore tenus motions.

Written motions are always best (because they become part of the written record of the case without paying a court reporter to provide a transcript) but if you're caught at a hearing and need to do so, make an ore tenus motion (i.e., a spoken motion) and be prepared to back it up by showing that the fact you want noticed is "obvious".

I'll explain by telling a true story, but to learn the rest of the story you'll need to order my affordable step-by-step 24-hour Jurisdictionary self-help course!

If was nearly 26 years ago when I was just beginning my career as a licensed attorney. My client was suing her former landlord to recover her security deposit. The mean old landlord claimed she damaged his property by cutting down a tree in the backyard.

The tree was a Brazilian Pepper tree, a nuisance plant here in Florida. The tree is related to poison ivy, poison oak, poison sumac. It's really more of a bush than a tree, though they grow quite large here in the Sunshine State. The University of Florida reports some people express respiratory problems associated with the bloom period of the tree, while others suffer from dermatitis after contact. The State of Florida has even developed a detailed management plan for the pest plant, including creation of a Brazilian Pepper Task Force!

So, here I was arguing for my client at a hearing to get her deposit back from her stupid, greedy landlord looking to make a fast buck by playing on the ignorance of others.

Of course I had a court reporter with me, taking down every word said by me, my client, the landlord, and the judge. That's why I won more often than others. Making a record is essential to victory (even though it does cost a bit to pay the court reporter to attend).

My client and I came to the hearing with photographs of the inside of the house she'd been renting to show how she had re-painted, cleaned the oven, scrubbed the floors, and left the place immaculate. That's what we thought the landlord's defense was: that she'd left the place a mess. When I saw her photographs (and the fact that her friend had taken the pictures, a friend we brought with us to testify to the accuracy of the pictures, if necessary) it seemed obvious to me we would win hands down.

Then the landlord starts whining about his lovely tree in the backyard and how my client had so rudely and without his permission cut it to the ground and dragged the branches out to the street for the city trash collectors to take them away.

By some stroke of God's Grace I'd recently read of the Brazilian Pepper and health problems it was causing, so I simply said, "Your honor, I move the court for an order taking judicial notice that the Brazilian Pepper has been adjudged a nuisance plant in Florida and therefore has no commercial value to justify the landlord's witholding my client's security deposit."

What happened next was wonderful. The judge smiled, evidently pleased at the opportunity I presented for him to tell us what he knew of this pesky bush. He leaned back in his giant leather-backed chair and actually put his hands behind his head as if he were going to tell a long story to his grandchildren. And, what a story it was. He went on for at least 10 minutes about the problems he and his family had and the concern officials have with the invasion of this plant from Argentina where it was seen as an attractive ornamental. He talked about rashes on his own hands received from whacking away at the menace in his own backyard. Then, suddenly, he leaned forward in his chair, turned toward the landlord with a menacing leer and pronounced, "Motion granted. Judgment for the plaintiff."

So, my client got her deposit money, and I learned a valuable lesson you would do well to learn for yourself. If a fact is commonly known, you can move the court to enter an order taking judicial notice of the fact - and then you need not struggle to prove the fact. It is a fact for all purposes throughout the remainder of the case!

Of course, like all other motions, the best way to make them is to write them on paper, file the original with the clerk, serve a copy on the opposing party, prepare a proposed order granting your motion, and set a hearing to argue your motion and get your proposed order signed.

www.Jurisdictionary.com

Comments:
I ordered your course several weeks ago and am really enjoying the fact that I understand the legal process better than I ever thought I could.  Your materials and teaching style are great and very easy to follow. ... Allan D. ... Brainerd, Minnesota

I have your course. I wish I had a picture of the opposing attorney when I objected to his attempt to get an affidavit admitted! Thanks! ... BJ H ... Pasadena, Maryland

I won a criminal case at trial with two lying witnesses against me. I got Jurisdictionary and learned that law works if it's used correctly. The judge read my memorandum and agreed with me. The most wonderful feeling I ever felt was walking out of that courtroom knowing I won without a lawyer! ... Philip J. ... Albany, Georgia
Logged

Luck

  • FSP Participant
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2174
Re: Sue Corruption [NEW: Make Court Case Easier]
« Reply #49 on: January 15, 2013, 12:20:59 pm »

Rules of Court and Law of the Case

Whether you're being sued or suing someone else, you must understand these two simple things - or risk losing! Winning is very simple! Every lawsuit turns on these two (2) simple things:
#1 ... the law of the case and
#2 ... the rules of court (evidence and procedure)

That's all there is to this game we call court!

If you've been duped by amateurs into seeing lawsuits any other way, or if you're so scared and confused it's all a muddy puddle of mind-boggling complications, rejoice! Winning is EASY once you see this simple truth! Don't let anyone intimidate you into thinking this is too complicated for average folks to grasp nor let them deceive you into thinking lawyers are smarter than the rest of the human race ... 'cause it ain't so! Anyone can learn what it takes to win! Absolutely anyone!

You simply need a clear view of the field of play, the object of the game, and the rules that control the players ... including judges and lawyers! You'll learn all this and more with my affordable, official step-by-step Jurisdictionary "How to Win in Court" self-help course.

#1 - THE LAW OF THE CASE
The law of the case is usually very simple! No matter what kind of case yours is, if you'll trust me for just a moment (and check me on this) you'll find that every lawsuit turns on what we lawyers call "the law of the case". Every last one of them. Every single one!

I've been an attorney since 1986. (Please don't hold that against me.) These past years I've dedicated to helping people just like you to pierce the mystery my profession has woven to hide the simple truths and tactics I teach in my affordable 24-hour course. My course unveils the amazing simplicity my profession doesn't want you to know so you can win in court ... without a lawyer! It's really simple once you see what I teach ... as tens of thousands have already learned!

For example, every foreclosure case turns (win or lose) on a very few legal principles that control the outcome of foreclosure - the rights of the lender versus the rights of the borrower. We attorneys call these principles "the law of the case" of foreclosure. It doesn't matter how big the bank or lender is. It doesn't matter how little the borrower is. The law of the case is the law of the case PERIOD! The law of the case controls the outcome for those who know how to use the rules of court (evidence and procedure) to prove what the law requires.

Automobile negligence, contract disputes, malpractice, slander, false imprisonment ... whatever a case is about, you'll find "the law of the case" is simple and usually easy to find. My course even shows you how to use online legal research to find the law of your case!

You don't need to know every law there is to win a simple contract dispute. The law of the case in a contract dispute is usually no more than a few appellate court opinions and perhaps a statute or two at most. Once you know how to find and can cite the official authorities that state the law of the case of contracts, you're halfway home!

The rest of the business of winning is simply using the rules to (1) allege what the law of the case requires, and (2) prove what you've alleged ... whether you're a plaintiff bringing the case or a defendant trying to avoid the line of fire!

#2 - THE RULES OF EVIDENCE AND PROCEDURE
Now assume you've found the law of the case that fits the facts of your lawsuit. You have the official citations that command victory for you IF you allege and prove what the law of the case requires. This is where the rules of evidence and procedure come into play ... and these are incredibly easy to learn!

Let's say plaintiff is coming after you to foreclose on your home. The first thing you do is find the law of the case that will control the outcome in your state. You now know what must be alleged by the plaintiff and proven by the plaintiff in order for the plaintiff to win. You also now know what you must allege in affirmative defenses and what you need to do with discovery and motions to prove the plaintiff cannot meet the burden of the law.

This stuff is really easy once you see how the separate parts fit together! You have tremendous power ... once you know how the game is played to win! Since 1997, when we started Jurisdictionary on the web, I've found the most debilitating factor that infects good people with hopelessness is fear that comes solely from lack of knowing how the game of litigation is played to win! Not knowing creates fear. Knowledge displaces fear with the confidence you need to overcome your opponent!

Take any apparently complicated thing apart to examine its component parts and you quickly see how they fit together. When you first begin, it seems impossible. But! If someone shows you how each separate part works with each of the other parts, even the most complicated things are suddenly easy-to-understand. The mystery my profession has woven disappears!

#1 - All lawsuits turn on the law of the case.
#2 - All lawsuits are won (or lost) by clever (or clumsy) use of the rules of court to cite the law of the case and prove the facts.
That's all there is to lawsuits - every one of them!

Sadly, too many good people never discover the power to win that's theirs. Therefore, evil people who know how to find the law of the case and use the rules of court take advantage of them!

Jurisdictionary wants to turn the tables on crooked lawyers and biased judges and protect the "little guys and gals" that are being taken advantage of simply because no one before has ever offered a course like my "How to Win in Court" self-help course. No one ever made it this easy-to-understand! www.Jurisdictionary.com
« Last Edit: January 15, 2013, 12:22:39 pm by Luck »
Logged

Luck

  • FSP Participant
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2174
Re: Sue Corruption [NEW: Patriot Myths in Court]
« Reply #50 on: January 15, 2013, 12:28:00 pm »

Beware of Legal Myths ... They're DANGEROUS!

Beware of Legal Mythology! Many today are angry at our justice system. Many have good cause to be angry! Some, however, are too angry! Their anger will hurt you! They are blinded by their anger! You'll recognize them by the anger. They are not your friend! Their "legal theories" fail. They are blinded by rage. Believe them at your peril.

#1 An angry fellow called to scream obscenities at me because I refused to agree with him that our birth certificates are some kind of "contract". The fundamental truth about contracts is that they cannot bind anyone who doesn't understand the agreement. Besides, we certainly didn't sign the thing! We can't be bound by a contract we don't understand and didn't sign. Yet, this man screamed at me for refusing to help him fight his dragons!

#2 Another angry person called insisting she had "copyrighted" her name so the courts couldn't use her name on official papers. To think one can prevent others from using one's name by "copyrighting" it is utter nonsense. Anger twists the mind in strange ways!

#3 Some are convinced our courts are "admiralty courts" and cannot rule in common law or statute, all because there is a yellow fringe on the courtroom flag. This lie has been promoted for years by angry people that don't know (or don't want to make any effort to know) the truth.

#4 Many have made a "religion" out of believing such lies. Some claim to be "patriots", yet do all they can to evade the Rule of Law and refuse to do anything toward learning the principles of due process so many gave their lives to protect in past and present wars!

#5 Thousands share emails and hover around the radio to hear commentators tell them how horrible things are and how much worse they soon will be, yet only a handful talk about how to make things better by exercising your "law power" in court!

I know people are hurting. We've helped tens of thousands of hurting people to get justice in the courts since 1997 when we launched Jurisdictionary on the web. Do you want to know how to get justice in our courts and honor the sacrifices of millions who died so you would have the "law power" you need to overcome corruption? Are you ready to begin? www.Jurisdictionary.com

Comment:
On 30 January I used what you teach to stop foreclosure. No mortgage. No foreclosure. No note. No foreclosure. ... Ken M. ... Tampa, Florida
Logged

Luck

  • FSP Participant
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2174
Re: Sue Corruption [NEW: Patriot Myths in Court]
« Reply #51 on: January 16, 2013, 03:59:18 pm »

Liberty, Justice, & The Rule of Law

I have a T-shirt that says "Freedom is not Free!" Patrick Henry said, "Give me Liberty or give me death!" Liberty is what we seek.
    Liberty to own a home.
    Liberty to run a business.
    Liberty to enjoy life.
    Liberty to walk the streets unharmed by hoodlums and assassins.
    Liberty to enjoy our God-given rights!

But, there's a crack in the Liberty Bell to warn us! The physical crack is real. We've seen the Bell and its physical crack up close. The Bell hangs in a Philadelphia museum. From a window near the Bell you see Independence Hall across the lawn, where the Declaration of Independence was signed, proclaiming a promise as yet not quite filled. The promise was "Justice for ALL". The crack in the Bell symbolizes our failure to secure Justice for ALL.

Too long "We the People" have let others run the "justice business" and, as a consequence, have failed to secure for ourselves and our posterity the blessings of liberty too many have died for ... far too many! Liberty without Justice is impossible! War and public protests alone can never secure Justice for ALL.

We the People must learn how Justice works and take the "justice business" away from the lawyers once and for all! We CAN ! The People are missing their opportunity to control my profession by learning the lawyer game and what it takes to win!

All those wonderful, brave, dedicated boys and girls putting their lives in danger and dying for the cause of Liberty ... while We the People allow Justice to be stolen from us by a profession that has made it a private business with closely-held trade secrets they refuse to share with the public!

Justice is not a business! Justice is a sacred right! Justice should be treated as a holy enterprise where truth alone is sought and the Rule of Law is secured for each and every one of us through strict enforcement of due process rules blind to money, blind to power, blind to political influence, and resistant to corruption of any kind!

Let THIS be the generation that secures Justice for ALL!
Let THIS be the generation that learns the rules of Justice.
Let THIS be the generation that teaches its children how to use the tools and processes that make Justice possible!
Let THIS be the generation that demands that Justice and its rules be taught to our children in our tax-supported schools!
Let THIS be the generation future leaders look back to and praise for giving the world Justice for ALL!
Let THIS be the generation that honors those who gave their lives for Liberty by learning how to secure the Justice that makes Liberty possible.
www.Jurisdictionary.com

Comment:
Got my second win in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. Thanks. ... Sonny S. ... Brooklyn, New York
Logged

Luck

  • FSP Participant
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2174
Re: Sue Corruption [NEW: How to Win in Court]
« Reply #52 on: January 21, 2013, 01:15:02 pm »

Know How to Control Judges!
How to Control the Judge!
Q. Can you win without controlling the judge?
A. You cannot! Doubt me at your peril!

I fought and won in court for more than a quarter-century by applying this simple secret: Control the judge or lose! There's no other way! How's it done? What's the big secret? Actually, it's no secret at all. It's very simple, really! So simple, in fact, it's uncanny! Laws, rules, testimony, and evidence count for nothing if you can't control the judge!

I received my law degree from an excellent law school in 1985, but law schools don't teach this simple secret to winning in court! Surprise you? It surprises me, too! I faithfully attended 3 years of classes and read every page of a stack of lawbooks 20-feet high, but we were never told this simple secret of: How to Win in Court.

You must control the judge! This is your #1 job... if you want to win! And, there's only ONE WAY to control the judge. Threaten appeal!

Use empty threats, quote internet legal mythology, demand to see his oath of office, challenge jurisdiction based on the color of the fringe on the courtroom flag, and you'll get absolutely nowhere!

The process is simple, and YOU can do it: Cite controlling appellate court opinions that agree with you and what you want the judge to do ... and threaten appeal if the judge doesn't agree with the appellate court opinions!

If you have a lawyer, he may be unwilling to stand up to the judge. He may be afraid to do it. But, if you want to win, someone must threaten the judge with appeal!

It's stupid to march into court demanding one's "Constitutional Rights", expecting the judge to admit your evidence, to deny evidence and tricks presented by the other side, and award judgment in your favor. It just doesn't work that way!

The key to winning in court is making a winning record for appeal (in case the judge rules against you) at all times by citing controlling appellate court opinions that agree with you and what you want the judge to do. You must make it clear to the judge that you will win on appeal if the judge chooses to rule against you!

It all comes down to this: "Judges fear being reversed on appeal." Too simple? I thought so, too ... at first.

It took a couple of years of law practice before I saw the light. Law school led me to believe judges were a higher life-form that only did right and always followed the law. Some judges I dealt with this past quarter-century were good people who tried their best. Others were arrogant egotists who thought the courtroom belonged to them instead of to the People and the courageous young men and women who gave their all so we could demand justice from such tyrants and get it!

Learn how to control judges so YOU can win! www.Jurisdictionary.com

What You Must Do To Win!
The following is a list of things YOU must do to win. All of these (and many more) are covered in the official 24-hour step-by-step Jurisdictionary "How to Win in Court" lawsuit self-help course:
    Draft proper pleadings with all fact elements
    Obtain all necessary evidence before trial
    Make effective oral motions
    Draft effective written motions
    Use online legal research
    Draft compelling memoranda
    Insure a written record of all proceedings
    Object promptly to all errors of opponent
    Object promptly to all errors of judge
    Renew objections to all un-cured errors of judge
    Keep your opponent's evidence out
    Get your evidence in
    Stop opponent from proposing false orders
    Offer to draft all orders
    Stop opponent's lawyer from testifying
    ... and more ... !
If you don't know how to do these simple tasks, you run the risk of losing.

Lawsuits are an axe fight. This course is your axe. Jurisdictionary has helped tens of thousands get justice in court since 1997 when the website was first launched. Now, learning what you must do to win is up to you! Many years ago I saw a bumper sticker saying, "If you want Peace, work for Justice!" Being angry doesn't help you or anyone else! Believing internet legal myths is stupid. The only thing that can help you is to learn and teach others how to use the official rules of due process that make Justice possible.

Learn the rules that control the courts, rules that stop corruption, rules that require judges to grant justice, rules that were paid for by far too much innocent blood already. Someone once said, "The truth will set you free!" If YOU believe that, learn the truth about Justice! Don't let anyone scare you into thinking it's too complicated for you to understand or deceive you into thinking lawyers are smarter than the rest of the human race ... 'cause it ain't so! Anyone can learn what it takes to win! Anyone means YOU!

Start with a clear view of the field of play, the object of the game, and the rules that control the players ... including the judges and lawyers! It's simple with the "How to Win in Court" lawsuit self-help course ... as many thousands have already learned!

Jurisdictionary wants to turn the tables on crooked lawyers and biased judges to protect the "little guys and gals" being taken advantage of because no one ever came out with a course like this before. No one ever cared enough to tell you the truth. No one ever made it this easy-to-understand! You will know what you must do to win in court!

Comment:
Thanks to your Jurisdictionary site, I learned so much that I won favor with the Magistrate and he ruled favorably on every motion I filed. I thank God for your web site, and thank you too! ... U. Lowe ... Cincinnati, Ohio
Logged

Luck

  • FSP Participant
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2174
Re: Sue Corruption [NEW: How to Enforce Your Rights]
« Reply #53 on: January 23, 2013, 03:29:13 pm »

Due Process and Constitutional Rights - How Constitutional Rights Are Enforced

Click HERE or on the chart image to view full-size flowchart how you can enforce your Constitutional right to "redress grievances" ... i.e., how your Constitutional Power works! No charge! This chart will help you win in court! It's simple enough, but critically important to study and understand.

Regrettably, many today are angry at the very system of Law & Order that is the only power they have to protect themselves from villainy at the hands of their fellow man and from the tyranny of despotic political power. This chart shows that YOU HAVE POWER!

Be careful whom you trust to teach you the law. There is a "movement" in our nation that has lost faith in America and our system of Law & Order. The leaders of this "movement" see only evil and none of the good. You can detect them by their anger and the "nifty tricks" they promise will win your way in court by "getting around" the rules. Why not learn the rules instead of rushing to court with silver-bullet promises and losing?

The Rules Rule! Those who refuse to learn the rules and uphold our American principles of Law & Order are no "patriots". Nor are they people you can trust to advise you how to get justice in our courts. The Constitution so many claim to believe in is itself a set of "rules". Without rules we are a lawless nation headed for disaster. Only when the People learn the rules can we hope to control those who use the rules to control us!

Most of you have taken a sacred oath before Almighty God to uphold the Constitution of the United States, yet most of you have no idea how to enforce the rights our Constitution guarantees!

There are far more "rights" guaranteed by our statutory and common law than the relatively few enumerated in our Constitution. Do you really know what "common law" is? Do you know how to "interpret" statutes correctly?

Are you facing one of these battles?
    Foreclosure
    Custody
    Child Support
    Taxation Issues
    Property Rights
    Criminal Charges
    Contract Disputes
    Slander
    Landlord-Tenant Problems Etcetera

Short of grabbing your squirrel gun and a box of ammo, the only way you can get your "redress of grievances" is through using our court system wisely. But! Notice the word, "wisely". So, click HERE and study the flowchart now.

And, be certain to visit Jurisdictionary to learn more about the official 24-hour "How to Win in Court" step-by-step lawsuit self-help course everyone is talking about! www.Jurisdictionary.com

COMMENT:
Ordered your course. Followed your plan. Other side had 3 attorneys. Cleaned their clock using your methods. Their case came down like a ton of bricks when I proved their elements were not there. Thank you! ... Michael L. ... Springville, New York
Logged

JustSomeGuy

  • FSP Participant
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 21
  • First 500 mover
Re: Sue Corruption [NEW: How to Enforce Your Rights]
« Reply #54 on: January 23, 2013, 03:47:47 pm »

umm.... Luck... I would call that stuff you posted by the name "spam". Am I missing something?
Logged

Luck

  • FSP Participant
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2174
Re: Sue Corruption [NEW: How to Enforce Your Rights]
« Reply #55 on: January 31, 2013, 07:27:53 pm »

Guy, I think Graves understands how to win in court and I encourage people to learn what he knows so they can do so too. It's not spam if it's useful info. I think he's likely right about a lot of the patriot mythology that helps people lose in court and go to prison needlessly.
Logged

Luck

  • FSP Participant
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2174
Re: Sue Corruption [NEW: How to Prove Your Case]
« Reply #56 on: January 31, 2013, 07:29:58 pm »

How to Prove Your Winning Case!
Jurisdictionary.com

Many people "assume" they know what it takes to win in court. Most of them lose! They think, "The facts and law are on my side. I should win!"

That's not how our courts work! Facts and Law are not enough! You must PROVE your case using the Rules.

Some people just get angry ... and lose! Others think they can use one of the internet's legal mythology silver bullets ... and lose!

A fact may be certain, yet not be "admissible evidence"! Those who march into court with their "facts", without knowing how to get those facts into the court's record as "admissible evidence" lose! Only "admissible evidence" wins in court. Learn how to get your evidence admitted at How to Win in Court

Help for Pro Se Litigants

Know What the Law Says! Too many pro se litigants mis-read the law. How can you hope to win If you don't know what the law "says". Reading law can be confusing, especially statutes and code.

Judges rely on how appellate courts interpret what lawmakers meant when they wrote the law. You dare not "assume" you are reading the law correctly. Learn how to read the law.

The only interpretation that can control the judge in your case is the interpretation given by the appellate courts. Do you know how to read appellate cases correctly? Learn how to read the law at How to Win in Court

Comments:
The opposing party dismissed their case against me. Thank you for the knowledge and insight you provided through your course. ... Gerald C. ... Tucker, Georgia
« Last Edit: January 31, 2013, 07:31:30 pm by Luck »
Logged

Luck

  • FSP Participant
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2174
Re: Sue Corruption [NEW: How to Prove Your Case]
« Reply #57 on: February 02, 2013, 07:35:34 pm »

Statist Tactics vs Patriots
I just started a thead called Statist Tactics vs Patriots in Court at http://forum.freestateproject.org/index.php?topic=26444.0
It has the Contents page etc from a book of tactics for "govt" to use against patriots in court. A few of what they label "anti-govt" websites are listed there at the bottom.

The book is called Anti-Government Movement Guidebook and it's online at
http://www.scribd.com/doc/122490811/The-Anti-Government-Guidebook-for-Judges

Here are some of the highlights fom the Table of Contents.
It includes suggestions to judges et al on how they should respond to the following "patriot" strategies.

An Overview of the Common Law Court Movement................................................1
The Posse Comitatus........................................................................................... 3
Avoiding Legal Authority................................................................................... 5
"Hidden History" as Justification........................................................................ 6
The Posse and the Common Law........................................................................ 9
The First Wave of the Common Law Movement............................................... 14
Challenging Subject Matter Jurisdiction.................................................... 32
A. The Gold-Fringed Flag Issue..................................................…................... 32
B. Typical Responses to the Flag Objection...................................................... 33
C. Additional Authority..........................................................…........................ 34
Subpart 2.2 - Challenging Personal Jurisdiction............................................................... 35
A. The "Sovereign" vs. the "Corporate" Citizen....…........................................ 35
B. Typical Responses to the Personal Jurisdiction Issue.................................... 36
C. Additional Authority............................. ........................................................ 38
Subpart 2.3 - Demanding Use of "The Common Law"...............…................................. 39
A.   Refusing to Enter the Bar....................................................…....................... 42
B.   Typical Responses to the Bar Argument............................…........................ 43
Disrupting the Operation of the Court....................................................................... 46
Subpart 3.1 - Refusing to Speak/Identify Oneself............................................................ 47
A. Refusal to Identify Oneself............................................................................ 47
A. Party Chooses to Remain Silent or Party Chooses
to "Filibuster"................................................................................................. 50
Subpart 3.3 - Demanding "Counsel of Choice"................................................................ 52
A. Party Requests to be Represented by a Non-Lawyer..................................... 52
A. Party Begins a Hunger Strike......................................................................... 56
Subpart 3.6 - Attempts to Disqualify the Judge................................................................ 57
A. Party Files "Odd" Documents/Uses Antiquated
Pleading Forms.............................................................................................. 60
A. Party Refuses to Sign Documents..................................…............................ 63
Subpart 4.1 - Interactions with the Clerk.......................................................................... 66
A. Service of Process/Personal Suits Against Court Personnel....…...….......... 69
Logged

Luck

  • FSP Participant
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2174
Re: Sue Corruption [NEW: Duty to Arrest Public Servants]
« Reply #58 on: February 09, 2013, 07:05:34 pm »

Here's a link for an important law fact: http://www.constitution.org/uslaw/16amjur2nd.htm
This appears to be actual U.S. law, which informs public servants of their duty to arrest any other public servant who commits an unlawful act, such as violating anyone's rights.

Legal responsibility to violations against corrupt legislators.

    Posted by Brian M Cox on December 7, 2011 at 1:34am in LEGISLATION & POLITICS

Unconstitutional Official Acts

16 Am Jur 2d, Sec 177 late 2d, Sec 256:

The general misconception is that any statute passed by legislators bearing the appearance of law constitutes the law of the land. The U.S. Constitution is the supreme law of the land, and any statute, to be valid, must be In agreement. It is impossible for both the Constitution and a law violating it to be valid; one must prevail. This is succinctly stated as follows:

The General rule is that an unconstitutional statute, though having the form and name of law is in reality no law, but is wholly void, and ineffective for any purpose; since unconstitutionality dates from the time of it's enactment and not merely from the date of the decision so branding it. An unconstitutional law, in legal contemplation, is as inoperative as if it had never been passed. Such a statute leaves the question that it purports to settle just as it would be had the statute not been enacted.

Since an unconstitutional law is void, the general principles follow that it imposes no duties, confers no rights, creates no office, bestows no power or authority on anyone, affords no protection, and justifies no acts performed under it.....

A void act cannot be legally consistent with a valid one. An unconstitutional law cannot operate to supersede any existing valid law. Indeed, insofar as a statute runs counter to the fundamental law of the lend, it is superseded thereby.

No one Is bound to obey an unconstitutional law and no courts are bound to enforce it.

Jon Roland:

Strictly speaking, an unconstitutional statute is not a "law", and should not be called a "law", even if it is sustained by a court, for a finding that a statute or other official act is constitutional does not make it so, or confer any authority to anyone to enforce it.

All citizens and legal residents of the United States, by their presence on the territory of the United States, are subject to the militia duty, the duty of the social compact that creates the society, which requires that each, alone and in concert with others, not only obey the Constitution and constitutional official acts, but help enforce them, if necessary, at the risk of one's life.

Any unconstitutional act of an official will at least be a violation of the oath of that official to execute the duties of his office, and therefore grounds for his removal from office. No official immunity or privileges of rank or position survive the commission of unlawful acts. If it violates the rights of individuals, it is also likely to be a crime, and the militia duty obligates anyone aware of such a violation to investigate it, gather evidence for a prosecution, make an arrest, and if necessary, seek an indictment from a grand jury, and if one is obtained, prosecute the offender in a court of law.

Here is the link to this info:

http://www.constitution.org/uslaw/16amjur2nd.htm

My question is does this still apply today and if so how do we unify to make this a reality?

Permalink Reply by Brian M Cox on December 7, 2011 at 3:28am

    I am pasting my response from the other discussion thread here because of its relevance.

    I stumbled upon this information while investigating S 1867 and it's sister bill passed by the House HR 1540 in May. I can think of 322 members of Congress and 93 Senators that should be arrested for their violation of their oath of office.

    I have been scampering like mad to get this information into social groups online who are active in activism, social networking, and the information war. I have been pleading my case to these people for quite some time that these groups need to accept the values of our Constitutional Militia and fellow Patriots.

    It does absolutely nothing to sit around online all day sharing links and or protesting without a legal approach and list of demands. We have the evidence to take legal action and if we don't, the premise of divide and conquer will prevail as the ultimate distraction to keep us unaware of how to remove these criminals from office, including at the executive level.

    This information needs to be examined by every Constitutional Militia in our Republic. How do we as Patriots put this into motion? I believe that an exorcise of our obligation is absolutely paramount to the survival of this once great nation. If we can present this case unto independent media as well as the masses, we may very well obtain the support of people as a whole to put this into action.

    I have been screaming online to the members of various groups that we must unite as a people to do this. It is disheartening to see so many who want change but can't even open their minds to the reality we face. The usurpation of our Government is the reality at hand. They have desecrated Our Republic and these so called elected officials are guilty of treason!

    Why is it that so many people are screaming and ranting about themselves being the 99% when none of them understand they will actually achieve nothing? Protesting Wall Street is an act in vein when insider trading is rampant in Congress. You can't get corruption out of politics when technocrats of the banking elite have the monopoly over the system.

    There is only one solution and granted that solution will lead to war. However, at least it would then become a war against foreign forces controlled by the Oligarchy itself and not with our own brothers and sisters, sons and daughters, mothers and fathers.

    We have to cut the strings of the puppet masters. The puppets need to be "confiscated" and convicted for their crimes. It is time to find out who are allies are within Government and within the system itself. If we can do that, we can change the course of history. But we don't have much time.

    http://www.constitution.org/uslaw/16amjur2nd.htm

    God help us all, and God Save the Republic!
« Last Edit: February 13, 2013, 09:56:31 am by Luck »
Logged

Luck

  • FSP Participant
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2174
Re: Sue Corruption [NEW: Cheap Law Course Tips]
« Reply #59 on: February 15, 2013, 07:49:35 pm »

Lawsuit Procedure At-A-Glance

It really IS this simple!
Do not remain in legal darkness!
The Rules are easy-to-learn and fair.

The judge may not be fair.
The lawyer on the other side probably won't be fair!

But, the Rules are fair.
Learn how to use the Rules to win!
It's NOT DIFFICULT.
You need no longer fear the legal system.
After all, our legal system is the only power the people have to protect ourselves from villainy at the hands of our fellow man.
The law and the courts are our only hope for Justice and Liberty.
It's easy to get justice in our courts once you know how.

Writing letters to the governor doesn't work.
Writing letters to the Bar doesn't work.
Writing letters to your congressman doesn't work.
Carrying signs in the street doesn't work.
Sending bulk emails doesn't work.

The Rules alone protect your rights!
Learn how to use the rules at How to Win in Court
www.HowToWinInCourt.com

The Law of the Case ...

Understand this ... AND WINNING IS EASY!
Every case is won or lost on only two (2) things!
    The Admissible Evidence and
    The Law of the Case
You don't need to know "every law" ever written!
You just need to know "the law of the case" ... your case!

Consider the fellow piling things in the balance shown here. Imagine he is "building his case". He doesn't have a great number of things on his side. He has a wee bit more than the other side, and that's all it takes to win!
    Admissible Evidence
    The Law of the Case

You may ask, "How can a pro se litigant win against someone with a lawyer?"
The answer is simple!
You don't need to know everything lawyers know!
You only need to know:
    The law of your case and
    How to use the rules to force the court to admit your evidence and enter the orders you seek.

The only "law" you need to know is the law that affects your case!
The law of the case is almost always extremely simple and straightforward. You don't need to know everything we lawyers were taught in law school.

It sounds simple because IT IS SIMPLE!
What I tell you IS ABSOLUTELY TRUE!
The law of your case can be understood in a single afternoon of online legal research.

Once you know what the law of your case is, the rest is simply convincing the court that:
    The law of the case is what you say it is, and
    You have more admissible evidence of the facts that "fit" the law.

Why remain in legal darkness?
Learn how to find and use "the law of your case" at How to Win in Court

Comments:
We filed a Motion to Strike Sham Complaint, like you show in your course. Two hours later the other side called to report they were dismissing the case! We were so happy we were crying with joy. We won! I cannot thank you enough for making it simple to follow. ... Tyler G. ... Olympia, Washington

Good Legal Writing
    Impress the judge?
    Confuse the opponent?
    Or ... win your case?
Your goal better be: make a winning record!

Too many pro se litigants miss this point. All words not aimed at making a winning record must go! Know how to write with punch, power, and persuasive effect.

Legal writing is NOT story-telling! Any fact not "relevant" and any law not "controlling" must be eliminated. The purpose for every word must be to make your winning record. Say what needs to be said and stop!

Learn what needs to be said and what shouldn't be. Learn to write effectively at How to Win in Court
www.HowToWinInCourt.com
Logged
Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6   Go Up
 

anything